Thiopental Versus Propofol in Combination with Remifentanil for Successful Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion: A Prospective, Randomised, Double-Blind Trial

<b>Background</b>: Remifentanil, an ultra-short-acting μ-receptor agonist, is used with propofol or thiopental for tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants. While effective with both, its combination with thiopental provides better hemodynamic stability. Thiopental has long been a standard intravenous agent for anaesthesia induction and remains a cost-effective alternative to propofol in resource-limited settings. To date, no study has directly compared the effects of thiopental-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil combinations on LMA insertion conditions. This study aims to compare the effects of thiopental or propofol with 2 µg·kg<sup>-1</sup> remifentanil on laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion conditions and success in a prospective, randomised double-blind study. <b>Method</b>: The study included 80 premedicated ASA I-II patients, aged 18-65, randomised into Group P (propofol) and Group T (thiopental). Anaesthesia induction was with 2 μg·kg<sup>-1</sup> remifentanil, followed by 5 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup> thiopental or 2.5 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup> propofol. LMA insertion occurred 90 s post-induction. LMA insertion conditions were evaluated using a six-variable scale. Systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and bispectral index monitor (BIS) values were recorded at baseline, 1 min pre-insertion, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 min after insertion. Apnoea duration, loss of eyelash reflex duration, insertion duration, number of attempts, and perioperative complications were also documented. <b>Results</b>: Demographic data were similar. Group P showed significantly shorter eyelash reflex loss and LMA insertion durations, longer apnoea duration, and higher rates of full mouth opening, excellent LMA insertion condition, and hypotension or bradycardia compared to Group T (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Group P had significantly lower HR, SAP, DAP, and MAP at various time points (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There were no significant differences in blood presence on LMA, sore throat, or dysphagia (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <b>Conclusions</b>: In our study, administration of 2 μg·kg<sup>-1</sup> remifentanil before induction along with thiopental or propofol was shown to provide acceptable LMA insertion conditions at comparable levels. As hemodynamic parameters were less affected, we believe the remifentanil-thiopental combination may be a suitable alternative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceuticals
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18081173
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thiopental Versus Propofol in Combination with Remifentanil for Successful Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion: A Prospective, Randomised, Double-Blind Trial

Ergin Alaygut, Mensure Çakırgöz, İsmail Demirel, Mert Akan et al.
3 citations
Pharmaceuticals
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
6.57
article

Thiopental Versus Propofol in Combination with Remifentanil for Successful Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion: A Prospective, Randomised, Double-Blind Trial

Ergin Alaygut, Mensure Çakırgöz, İsmail Demirel, Mert Akan, Abdurrahman Tünay, Aysun Afi̇fe Kar, Ömürhan Saraç, Oğuzhan Demirel
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Remifentanil, an ultra-short-acting μ-receptor agonist, is used with propofol or thiopental for tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants. While effective with both, its combination with thiopental provides better hemodynamic stability. Thiopental has long been a standard intravenous agent for anaesthesia induction and remains a cost-effective alternative to propofol in resource-limited settings. To date, no study has directly compared the effects of thiopental-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil combinations on LMA insertion conditions. This study aims to compare the effects of thiopental or propofol with 2 µg·kg<sup>-1</sup> remifentanil on laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion conditions and success in a prospective, randomised double-blind study. <b>Method</b>: The study included 80 premedicated ASA I-II patients, aged 18-65, randomised into Group P (propofol) and Group T (thiopental). Anaesthesia induction was with 2 μg·kg<sup>-1</sup> remifentanil, followed by 5 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup> thiopental or 2.5 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup> propofol. LMA insertion occurred 90 s post-induction. LMA insertion conditions were evaluated using a six-variable scale. Systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and bispectral index monitor (BIS) values were recorded at baseline, 1 min pre-insertion, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 min after insertion. Apnoea duration, loss of eyelash reflex duration, insertion duration, number of attempts, and perioperative complications were also documented. <b>Results</b>: Demographic data were similar. Group P showed significantly shorter eyelash reflex loss and LMA insertion durations, longer apnoea duration, and higher rates of full mouth opening, excellent LMA insertion condition, and hypotension or bradycardia compared to Group T (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Group P had significantly lower HR, SAP, DAP, and MAP at various time points (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There were no significant differences in blood presence on LMA, sore throat, or dysphagia (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <b>Conclusions</b>: In our study, administration of 2 μg·kg<sup>-1</sup> remifentanil before induction along with thiopental or propofol was shown to provide acceptable LMA insertion conditions at comparable levels. As hemodynamic parameters were less affected, we believe the remifentanil-thiopental combination may be a suitable alternative.

PharmaceuticalsVol. 18(8)
Izmir University (TR), Fırat University (TR), Sina Hospital (IR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Kent Hastanesi (TR), Türk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Derneği (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
6.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.