Comparison of Bulk Piezoelectric and Opto-Mechanical Micromachined Detectors for Optoacoustic and Ultrasound Sensing

Optical detection of sound, using optomechanical micromachined ultrasound sensors (OMUS), is a promising detection technology for optoacoustic (OptA) imaging because it achieves a small active detection area, in the few tens of micrometers size, without loss of sensitivity as a function of area size. It also has potential to be produced as array configurations at low cost. However, while OMUS sensitivity has been reported in terms of noise equivalent pressure density (NEPD), there has been no comparison to conventional piezoelectric transducers under identical conditions. We differentially compared a highly sensitive ring-resonator-based OMUS and a single element focused piezoelectric ultrasound transducer (FPUT), under the same experimental conditions. The comparison considered the detectors’ signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), impulse response, axial point-spread-function and their spatial sensitivity. Our results show that OMUS attained lower SNR to FPUT, when operating at the same working distance, but similar performance when placed close to the sample interrogated, for example, as it relates to OptA microscopy. Advantageously, OMUS uniquely offers the spatial behavior of a point-like acoustic detector which reduces the sensitivity to ultrasound interference effects occurring on the large detection area of FPUTs. We discuss the implications of the two detection approaches in the design of OptA systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Sensors Journal
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2025.3594425
Primary Topic
Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Bulk Piezoelectric and Opto-Mechanical Micromachined Detectors for Optoacoustic and Ultrasound Sensing

U. Stahl, Xavier Rottenberg, Vasilis Ntziachristos, Hilde Jans et al.
IEEE Sensors Journal
Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
article

Comparison of Bulk Piezoelectric and Opto-Mechanical Micromachined Detectors for Optoacoustic and Ultrasound Sensing

U. Stahl, Xavier Rottenberg, Vasilis Ntziachristos, Hilde Jans, Alexander Prebeck, Grim Keulemans
article en

Abstract

Optical detection of sound, using optomechanical micromachined ultrasound sensors (OMUS), is a promising detection technology for optoacoustic (OptA) imaging because it achieves a small active detection area, in the few tens of micrometers size, without loss of sensitivity as a function of area size. It also has potential to be produced as array configurations at low cost. However, while OMUS sensitivity has been reported in terms of noise equivalent pressure density (NEPD), there has been no comparison to conventional piezoelectric transducers under identical conditions. We differentially compared a highly sensitive ring-resonator-based OMUS and a single element focused piezoelectric ultrasound transducer (FPUT), under the same experimental conditions. The comparison considered the detectors’ signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), impulse response, axial point-spread-function and their spatial sensitivity. Our results show that OMUS attained lower SNR to FPUT, when operating at the same working distance, but similar performance when placed close to the sample interrogated, for example, as it relates to OptA microscopy. Advantageously, OMUS uniquely offers the spatial behavior of a point-like acoustic detector which reduces the sensitivity to ultrasound interference effects occurring on the large detection area of FPUTs. We discuss the implications of the two detection approaches in the design of OptA systems.

IEEE Sensors JournalVol. 25(18)
IMEC (BE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.