Use of evaluation evidence in municipal decisions: The case of Tshwane’s indigent programme

Background: Evidence-based decision-making (EBDM) is a fundamental principle in governance, particularly in social welfare policies where programme effectiveness depends on rigorous data analysis. However, in many municipal contexts, including South Africa, decision-making relies heavily on administrative data and performance monitoring, with limited integration of evaluation evidence into policymaking. Aim: This study examines the key factors influencing the use of evaluation evidence in decision-making for the indigent programme exit strategy in the City of Tshwane (CoT). It identifies systemic barriers to evidence use and explores how political dynamics, institutional structures and capacity constraints affect the uptake of evaluation findings in municipal governance. Methods: Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through semi-structured interviews, document analysis and focus group discussions with municipal officials, political stakeholders and programme beneficiaries. This triangulated methodology provides a comprehensive understanding of how evaluation evidence or the lack thereof influences local policymaking. Results: The study reveals that the absence of a structured evaluation culture, political interference and weak institutional frameworks limits the use of evaluation evidence. Municipal decision-makers often prefer performance monitoring over impact evaluations, resulting in policy inertia. Political actors selectively use evidence that aligns with electoral interests, while weak knowledge systems and limited technical capacity hinder accessibility and application of evaluation findings. Conclusion: To enhance programme effectiveness, municipalities must institutionalise evaluation, improve political commitment to evidence use, and develop robust knowledge management systems. Contribution: This study advances understanding of the barriers to evidence-informed decision-making in South African municipalities and offers practical recommendations for reform.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Local Government Research and Innovation
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4102/jolgri.v6i0.278
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of evaluation evidence in municipal decisions: The case of Tshwane’s indigent programme

Lesedi Senamele Matlala, Diniko Piet Setwaba
1 citations
Journal of Local Government Research and Innovation
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
2.11
article

Use of evaluation evidence in municipal decisions: The case of Tshwane’s indigent programme

Lesedi Senamele Matlala, Diniko Piet Setwaba
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based decision-making (EBDM) is a fundamental principle in governance, particularly in social welfare policies where programme effectiveness depends on rigorous data analysis. However, in many municipal contexts, including South Africa, decision-making relies heavily on administrative data and performance monitoring, with limited integration of evaluation evidence into policymaking. Aim: This study examines the key factors influencing the use of evaluation evidence in decision-making for the indigent programme exit strategy in the City of Tshwane (CoT). It identifies systemic barriers to evidence use and explores how political dynamics, institutional structures and capacity constraints affect the uptake of evaluation findings in municipal governance. Methods: Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through semi-structured interviews, document analysis and focus group discussions with municipal officials, political stakeholders and programme beneficiaries. This triangulated methodology provides a comprehensive understanding of how evaluation evidence or the lack thereof influences local policymaking. Results: The study reveals that the absence of a structured evaluation culture, political interference and weak institutional frameworks limits the use of evaluation evidence. Municipal decision-makers often prefer performance monitoring over impact evaluations, resulting in policy inertia. Political actors selectively use evidence that aligns with electoral interests, while weak knowledge systems and limited technical capacity hinder accessibility and application of evaluation findings. Conclusion: To enhance programme effectiveness, municipalities must institutionalise evaluation, improve political commitment to evidence use, and develop robust knowledge management systems. Contribution: This study advances understanding of the barriers to evidence-informed decision-making in South African municipalities and offers practical recommendations for reform.

Journal of Local Government Research and InnovationVol. 6
University of Johannesburg (ZA), Government of South Africa (ZA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.