Understanding the burden of COVID-19 orphanhood and caregiver loss among children and adolescents living in South Africa

While caregiver loss is known to have significant repercussions for the wellbeing and developmental trajectories of children and adolescents, limited evidence has examined the impact of orphanhood due to COVID-19 on children and adolescents. To respond to this gap and support better planning for future crises, we examined the short-term impacts of COVID-19-related orphanhood on children’s and adolescents’ wellbeing through the Orphanhood and Caregiver Loss Among Adolescents and Youth (OCAY) study. No such studies exist globally and this provides a unique insight into this hidden group. We hypothesised that there would be multiple mental health impacts on children experiencing such loss. We collected data from children and adolescents aged 9–18 years in peri-urban Khayelitsha, South Africa, including those who lost a parent/caregiver to COVID-19 and a community comparison group who did not. Trained research assistants administered questionnaires, utilising standardised inventories and validated scales, that explored young participants’ mental health, wellbeing, and social circumstances. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics, and multivariate linear and logistic regression models in STATA18 and R. Our final sample included n = 421 children and adolescents (n = 211 experiencing parental/caregiver loss, n = 210 controls) with a mean age of 12.7 years (SD = 2.3), with no significant between-group differences. Males experiencing COVID-related orphanhood were more likely to report rule breaking behaviour compared to females experiencing orphanhood (4.3 vs. 2.7, Cliff’s d = 0.34 [95 %CI: 0.07, 0.61], p = 0.04). Children experiencing the death of a primary caregiver were more likely to report a greater mental health burden compared to children experiencing the loss of a non-primary caregiver (p=<0.05). Multiple regression analyses showed that children and adolescents affected by COVID-related loss experienced significantly greater levels of food insecurity ( OR = 2.14 [95 %CI: 1.04–4.40], p = 0.038), greater caregiving burdens in the household ( β = 1.08 [95 %CI: 0.33–1.83], p = 0.005), poorer mental health and suicidality ( β = 0.18 [95 %CI: 0.00–0.36], p = 0.047), and more social risk behaviours ( β = 0.75 [95 %CI: 0.01–1.49], p = 0.046) than their control group counterparts, even after controlling for sociodemographic and household information. Children and adolescents experiencing higher levels of poverty and who had any disability were at particular disadvantage. This paper presents new evidence on how caregiver loss—beyond the influence of factors such as sex, age, disability, and poverty—can increase children’s vulnerability. Such vulnerability included food insecurity, additional domestic burdens of caregiving, elevated grief, suicidality, and the tendency to engage in social risk behaviours. This data illuminates the need for planning and provision to prevent and respond to such loss.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children and Youth Services Review
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108516
Primary Topic
Family Support in Illness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the burden of COVID-19 orphanhood and caregiver loss among children and adolescents living in South Africa

Christina A. Laurenzi, Tatenda Mawoyo, Kathryn J. Roberts, Lorraine Sherr et al.
Children and Youth Services Review
Family Support in Illness
article

Understanding the burden of COVID-19 orphanhood and caregiver loss among children and adolescents living in South Africa

Christina A. Laurenzi, Tatenda Mawoyo, Kathryn J. Roberts, Lorraine Sherr, Mark Tomlinson, Ramsha Hisham, Lucie Dale Cluver
article en

Abstract

While caregiver loss is known to have significant repercussions for the wellbeing and developmental trajectories of children and adolescents, limited evidence has examined the impact of orphanhood due to COVID-19 on children and adolescents. To respond to this gap and support better planning for future crises, we examined the short-term impacts of COVID-19-related orphanhood on children’s and adolescents’ wellbeing through the Orphanhood and Caregiver Loss Among Adolescents and Youth (OCAY) study. No such studies exist globally and this provides a unique insight into this hidden group. We hypothesised that there would be multiple mental health impacts on children experiencing such loss. We collected data from children and adolescents aged 9–18 years in peri-urban Khayelitsha, South Africa, including those who lost a parent/caregiver to COVID-19 and a community comparison group who did not. Trained research assistants administered questionnaires, utilising standardised inventories and validated scales, that explored young participants’ mental health, wellbeing, and social circumstances. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics, and multivariate linear and logistic regression models in STATA18 and R. Our final sample included n = 421 children and adolescents (n = 211 experiencing parental/caregiver loss, n = 210 controls) with a mean age of 12.7 years (SD = 2.3), with no significant between-group differences. Males experiencing COVID-related orphanhood were more likely to report rule breaking behaviour compared to females experiencing orphanhood (4.3 vs. 2.7, Cliff’s d = 0.34 [95 %CI: 0.07, 0.61], p = 0.04). Children experiencing the death of a primary caregiver were more likely to report a greater mental health burden compared to children experiencing the loss of a non-primary caregiver (p=<0.05). Multiple regression analyses showed that children and adolescents affected by COVID-related loss experienced significantly greater levels of food insecurity ( OR = 2.14 [95 %CI: 1.04–4.40], p = 0.038), greater caregiving burdens in the household ( β = 1.08 [95 %CI: 0.33–1.83], p = 0.005), poorer mental health and suicidality ( β = 0.18 [95 %CI: 0.00–0.36], p = 0.047), and more social risk behaviours ( β = 0.75 [95 %CI: 0.01–1.49], p = 0.046) than their control group counterparts, even after controlling for sociodemographic and household information. Children and adolescents experiencing higher levels of poverty and who had any disability were at particular disadvantage. This paper presents new evidence on how caregiver loss—beyond the influence of factors such as sex, age, disability, and poverty—can increase children’s vulnerability. Such vulnerability included food insecurity, additional domestic burdens of caregiving, elevated grief, suicidality, and the tendency to engage in social risk behaviours. This data illuminates the need for planning and provision to prevent and respond to such loss.

Children and Youth Services ReviewVol. 178
Queen's University Belfast (GB), University of Cape Town (ZA), Oxford Policy Management (GB), Stellenbosch University (ZA), University of Oxford (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Family Support in Illness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.