Spatial risk of pathogen transmission from cattle to vulnerable and endangered wild bovids in Thailand

Abstract The interaction between livestock and wildlife causes challenges for wildlife conservation and public health. Mapping interface areas is essential for prioritizing disease surveillance, implementing mitigation measures, and developing targeted control programs to protect threatened wildlife. We used spatial overlays of habitat suitability to predict interface areas with high risk of pathogen transmission for three Thai wild bovids (gaur [ Bos gaurus ], banteng [ Bos javanicus ] and wild water buffalo [ Bubalus arnee ]) and domestic cattle. We assumed that domestic cattle are the reservoir of important bovine infectious diseases and that high cattle density is a proxy for a higher transmission risk. We calculated the interface inside and outside Thai protected areas and classified these by land use types. Then, we counted the number of bovine infectious disease occurrences reported in high‐risk areas. Our study indicated that the highest risk areas for these species are at the forest edges where high habitat suitability and cattle densities overlap. Suitable habitats for wild water buffalo had the largest proportion of high‐risk areas (9%), while gaur and banteng had similar risk areas (4%). Kuiburi National Park had the largest risk area (274 km 2 ) for gaur and banteng, whereas the largest risk area for wild water buffalo overlapped with Huai Thabthan‐Had Samran by 126 km 2 . Cropland and unclassified forests had the highest percentage of interface areas, indicating a higher risk of pathogen transmission. Our results highlight how habitat suitability analyses could help infectious disease prevention and control strategies and may also support wild bovid conservation initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70111
Primary Topic
Zoonotic diseases and public health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial risk of pathogen transmission from cattle to vulnerable and endangered wild bovids in Thailand

Reju Sam John, Wantida Horpiencharoen, David T. S. Hayman, Renata L. Muylaert et al.
Conservation Science and Practice
Zoonotic diseases and public health
article

Spatial risk of pathogen transmission from cattle to vulnerable and endangered wild bovids in Thailand

Reju Sam John, Wantida Horpiencharoen, David T. S. Hayman, Renata L. Muylaert, Jonathan C. Marshall
article en

Abstract

Abstract The interaction between livestock and wildlife causes challenges for wildlife conservation and public health. Mapping interface areas is essential for prioritizing disease surveillance, implementing mitigation measures, and developing targeted control programs to protect threatened wildlife. We used spatial overlays of habitat suitability to predict interface areas with high risk of pathogen transmission for three Thai wild bovids (gaur [ Bos gaurus ], banteng [ Bos javanicus ] and wild water buffalo [ Bubalus arnee ]) and domestic cattle. We assumed that domestic cattle are the reservoir of important bovine infectious diseases and that high cattle density is a proxy for a higher transmission risk. We calculated the interface inside and outside Thai protected areas and classified these by land use types. Then, we counted the number of bovine infectious disease occurrences reported in high‐risk areas. Our study indicated that the highest risk areas for these species are at the forest edges where high habitat suitability and cattle densities overlap. Suitable habitats for wild water buffalo had the largest proportion of high‐risk areas (9%), while gaur and banteng had similar risk areas (4%). Kuiburi National Park had the largest risk area (274 km 2 ) for gaur and banteng, whereas the largest risk area for wild water buffalo overlapped with Huai Thabthan‐Had Samran by 126 km 2 . Cropland and unclassified forests had the highest percentage of interface areas, indicating a higher risk of pathogen transmission. Our results highlight how habitat suitability analyses could help infectious disease prevention and control strategies and may also support wild bovid conservation initiatives.

Conservation Science and PracticeVol. 7(8)
The University of Sydney (AU), Massey University (NZ)
Australian Government, Massey Foundation, Royal Society Te Apārangi, Massey University, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Zoonotic diseases and public health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.