Multi-actor co-creation of innovative protein-rich appetisers for older adults: From the kitchen to real-life consumer tasting

Co-creation has gained attention for its potential to develop new food products that align with consumer expectations and acceptance. However, culinary co-creation, particularly involving key food system stakeholders, remains underexplored. This study examines stakeholder group composition in culinary co-creation to develop innovative food tailored for community-living older adults (55–75 years). Co-creation workshops aimed to develop an initial prototype appetiser into a final food product. Two group compositions were tested: one consisting solely of older adult consumers (C) and another compromising a mix of older adults, culinary, and health experts (C + E). Six workshops were conducted, involving 27 participants, featuring tastings and culinary creation sessions with a chef. The study explored cognitive creativity differences through a thematic analysis of idea generation. Satisfaction and participation levels, measured using Likert scales, indicated similar participant creativity levels between the two group compositions. Independent expert judges evaluated the co-created foods on novelty, workability, and adequacy, using a multi-criteria evaluation tool. This approach led to the selection of three developed appetisers, for a consumer study involving 236 older adults, evaluated in an experimental restaurant setting. The initial prototype's liking score (6.2 ± 1.5) was significantly lower than the appetisers developed by the consumers group (6.8 ± 1.5) and the mixed group (7.0 ± 1.5) (ANOVA, p < 0.001). This study introduces a novel multi-stakeholder protocol for co-creation in a culinary context, showcasing potential in developing tailored foods for older adults and providing valuable insights for future research and practical implementation within the food industry. • Culinary co-creation protocols help align food products with consumer expectations. • Creativity indicators explored impact of kitchen context and group composition. • Groups with multiple actors had more focused recipe ideas and local ingredient use. • Validation of co-creation approach in a realistic setting by targeted consumers. • Older adults preferred co-created appetisers more than the initial prototype.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Quality and Preference
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105660
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Service and Product Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-actor co-creation of innovative protein-rich appetisers for older adults: From the kitchen to real-life consumer tasting

Audrey Cosson, Lucia Espinosa-Brisset, Anne Saint‐Eve, Agnès Giboreau et al.
2 citations
Food Quality and Preference
Service and Product Innovation
4.15
article

Multi-actor co-creation of innovative protein-rich appetisers for older adults: From the kitchen to real-life consumer tasting

Audrey Cosson, Lucia Espinosa-Brisset, Anne Saint‐Eve, Agnès Giboreau, Sarah Domingie
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Co-creation has gained attention for its potential to develop new food products that align with consumer expectations and acceptance. However, culinary co-creation, particularly involving key food system stakeholders, remains underexplored. This study examines stakeholder group composition in culinary co-creation to develop innovative food tailored for community-living older adults (55–75 years). Co-creation workshops aimed to develop an initial prototype appetiser into a final food product. Two group compositions were tested: one consisting solely of older adult consumers (C) and another compromising a mix of older adults, culinary, and health experts (C + E). Six workshops were conducted, involving 27 participants, featuring tastings and culinary creation sessions with a chef. The study explored cognitive creativity differences through a thematic analysis of idea generation. Satisfaction and participation levels, measured using Likert scales, indicated similar participant creativity levels between the two group compositions. Independent expert judges evaluated the co-created foods on novelty, workability, and adequacy, using a multi-criteria evaluation tool. This approach led to the selection of three developed appetisers, for a consumer study involving 236 older adults, evaluated in an experimental restaurant setting. The initial prototype's liking score (6.2 ± 1.5) was significantly lower than the appetisers developed by the consumers group (6.8 ± 1.5) and the mixed group (7.0 ± 1.5) (ANOVA, p < 0.001). This study introduces a novel multi-stakeholder protocol for co-creation in a culinary context, showcasing potential in developing tailored foods for older adults and providing valuable insights for future research and practical implementation within the food industry. • Culinary co-creation protocols help align food products with consumer expectations. • Creativity indicators explored impact of kitchen context and group composition. • Groups with multiple actors had more focused recipe ideas and local ingredient use. • Validation of co-creation approach in a realistic setting by targeted consumers. • Older adults preferred co-created appetisers more than the initial prototype.

Food Quality and PreferenceVol. 134
AgroParisTech (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Institut Paul Bocuse (FR), Paris-Saclay Food and Bioproduct Engineering Research Unit (FR)
Firmenich, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie, AgroParisTech, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement, CHIST-ERA
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Service and Product Innovation
4.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.