A review of computational thinking interventions in upper elementary education

This review examines current trends in Computational Thinking (CT) educational interventions. Analyzing 54 studies from 2012 to 2024, the review identifies key trends in the implementation of CT interventions, including duration, number of participants, and programming tools. Most interventions with upper-elementary students span more than a month, involve between 20 and 100 children, and use unplugged activities and visual programming environments. The review also investigates the extent to which student context data, such as gender and socioeconomic background, are considered, highlighting the importance of these factors in CT interventions. The findings suggest that while some interventions account for gender and contextual differences, there is a potential for a greater focus on these aspects to address social inequalities. This study provides valuable insights into the potential impact and inclusiveness of CT educational strategies, serving as a resource for educators, researchers, and policy makers aiming to improve CT integration into educational frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Education Open
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100252
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A review of computational thinking interventions in upper elementary education

Alejandra Carboni, Marcos Viera, Anaclara Gerosa, María Eugenia Curi
Computers and Education Open
Teaching and Learning Programming
article

A review of computational thinking interventions in upper elementary education

Alejandra Carboni, Marcos Viera, Anaclara Gerosa, María Eugenia Curi
article en

Abstract

This review examines current trends in Computational Thinking (CT) educational interventions. Analyzing 54 studies from 2012 to 2024, the review identifies key trends in the implementation of CT interventions, including duration, number of participants, and programming tools. Most interventions with upper-elementary students span more than a month, involve between 20 and 100 children, and use unplugged activities and visual programming environments. The review also investigates the extent to which student context data, such as gender and socioeconomic background, are considered, highlighting the importance of these factors in CT interventions. The findings suggest that while some interventions account for gender and contextual differences, there is a potential for a greater focus on these aspects to address social inequalities. This study provides valuable insights into the potential impact and inclusiveness of CT educational strategies, serving as a resource for educators, researchers, and policy makers aiming to improve CT integration into educational frameworks.

Computers and Education OpenVol. 9
Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Teaching and Learning Programming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A review of computational thinking interventions in upper elementary education — Alejandra Carboni, Marcos Viera, et al. · Computers and Education Open (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS