Remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine in awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy guided laryngeal surgeries

Background: Awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy (AFB) is an essential technique for securing the airway in patients with complex anatomical challenges, such as laryngeal masses, where conventional intubation may be difficult. This study compares the efficacy of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for sedation during AFB in patients undergoing laryngeal surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the data of 76 patients who underwent AFB for tracheal intubation between January 2021 and April 2024. The patients were divided into two sedation groups: Remifentanil (n = 38) and Dexmedetomidine (n = 38). The primary outcomes included intubation time, the number of intubation attempts, patient comfort scores, and postoperative cough scores. Sedation was titrated to achieve a Ramsay sedation score of 3–4, and to ensure comparability, baseline characteristics such as demographic data, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classifications and Mallampati scores were compared. Results: The baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. However, dexmedetomidine was associated with significantly shorter intubation times (52.39 ± 16.94 vs. 70.50 ± 20.42 seconds, p < 0.01), fewer intubation attempts (1.58 ± 0.56 vs. 2.08 ± 0.62, p < 0.01) and better patient comfort scores (1.82 ± 0.56 vs. 2.13 ± 0.62, p = 0.02). Additionally, postoperative cough scores were lower in the dexmedetomidine group (2.00 ± 0.61 vs. 2.32 ± 0.57, p = 0.02), indicating reduced airway irritation after the procedure. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine was associated with superior sedation compared to remifentanil for AFB in patients undergoing laryngeal surgery due to improved patient comfort, shortened intubation time and reduced number of intubation attempts. The lower postoperative cough scores further suggest a potential benefit in minimizing airway irritation. Given its minimal respiratory depressive effects and enhanced procedural efficiency, dexmedetomidine could be the preferred sedative agent for AFB in this patient population.

Publication Details

Journal
Signa Vitae
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22514/sv.2025.113
Primary Topic
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine in awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy guided laryngeal surgeries

Signa Vitae
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
article

Remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine in awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy guided laryngeal surgeries

article en

Abstract

Background: Awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy (AFB) is an essential technique for securing the airway in patients with complex anatomical challenges, such as laryngeal masses, where conventional intubation may be difficult. This study compares the efficacy of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for sedation during AFB in patients undergoing laryngeal surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the data of 76 patients who underwent AFB for tracheal intubation between January 2021 and April 2024. The patients were divided into two sedation groups: Remifentanil (n = 38) and Dexmedetomidine (n = 38). The primary outcomes included intubation time, the number of intubation attempts, patient comfort scores, and postoperative cough scores. Sedation was titrated to achieve a Ramsay sedation score of 3–4, and to ensure comparability, baseline characteristics such as demographic data, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classifications and Mallampati scores were compared. Results: The baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. However, dexmedetomidine was associated with significantly shorter intubation times (52.39 ± 16.94 vs. 70.50 ± 20.42 seconds, p < 0.01), fewer intubation attempts (1.58 ± 0.56 vs. 2.08 ± 0.62, p < 0.01) and better patient comfort scores (1.82 ± 0.56 vs. 2.13 ± 0.62, p = 0.02). Additionally, postoperative cough scores were lower in the dexmedetomidine group (2.00 ± 0.61 vs. 2.32 ± 0.57, p = 0.02), indicating reduced airway irritation after the procedure. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine was associated with superior sedation compared to remifentanil for AFB in patients undergoing laryngeal surgery due to improved patient comfort, shortened intubation time and reduced number of intubation attempts. The lower postoperative cough scores further suggest a potential benefit in minimizing airway irritation. Given its minimal respiratory depressive effects and enhanced procedural efficiency, dexmedetomidine could be the preferred sedative agent for AFB in this patient population.

Signa VitaeVol. 21(8)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine in awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy guided laryngeal surgeries · Signa Vitae (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS