Letter re: The efficacy of immunotherapy combined with capecitabine versus immunotherapy alone as maintenance therapy in patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective propensity score matching study

Letter re: The efficacy of immunotherapy combined with capecitabine versus immunotherapy alone as maintenance therapy in patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective propensity score matching studyWe read with great interest the recent study by He et al., 1 investigating the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and capecitabine as maintenance therapy in patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC).The authors report that the addition of capecitabine to maintenance ICIs significantly prolongs progression-free survival (PFS), particularly in patients with polymetastatic disease and detectable Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA after initial therapy.However, several points merit further discussion.Firstly, the rationale for this study appears to rely heavily on prior data from Liu et al., 2 which demonstrated the benefits of capecitabine maintenance in patients who had previously received triplet chemotherapy regimens containing capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil as part of their induction therapy.However, it is important to highlight that, in clinical practice, the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin has emerged as the established first-line induction chemotherapy for patients with mNPC. 3 More recently, ICIs with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibodies combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin have become the new standard of care in the first-line setting, demonstrating further improvements in PFS. 4 In contrast, in the present study, more than half of the patients did not receive an induction regimen containing fluoropyrimidines.Consequently, the maintenance approach evaluated in this study does not represent a true continuation of the initial induction chemotherapy backbone.Rather, it involves introducing a new treatment agent, capecitabine, solely in the maintenance setting, raising concerns about the biological plausibility and clinical relevance of this approach.For a

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Open
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105566
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Letter re: The efficacy of immunotherapy combined with capecitabine versus immunotherapy alone as maintenance therapy in patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective propensity score matching study

Tahir Kemal Şahin, D C Guven
ESMO Open
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Letter re: The efficacy of immunotherapy combined with capecitabine versus immunotherapy alone as maintenance therapy in patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective propensity score matching study

Tahir Kemal Şahin, D C Guven
article en

Abstract

Letter re: The efficacy of immunotherapy combined with capecitabine versus immunotherapy alone as maintenance therapy in patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective propensity score matching studyWe read with great interest the recent study by He et al., 1 investigating the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and capecitabine as maintenance therapy in patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC).The authors report that the addition of capecitabine to maintenance ICIs significantly prolongs progression-free survival (PFS), particularly in patients with polymetastatic disease and detectable Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA after initial therapy.However, several points merit further discussion.Firstly, the rationale for this study appears to rely heavily on prior data from Liu et al., 2 which demonstrated the benefits of capecitabine maintenance in patients who had previously received triplet chemotherapy regimens containing capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil as part of their induction therapy.However, it is important to highlight that, in clinical practice, the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin has emerged as the established first-line induction chemotherapy for patients with mNPC. 3 More recently, ICIs with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibodies combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin have become the new standard of care in the first-line setting, demonstrating further improvements in PFS. 4 In contrast, in the present study, more than half of the patients did not receive an induction regimen containing fluoropyrimidines.Consequently, the maintenance approach evaluated in this study does not represent a true continuation of the initial induction chemotherapy backbone.Rather, it involves introducing a new treatment agent, capecitabine, solely in the maintenance setting, raising concerns about the biological plausibility and clinical relevance of this approach.For a

ESMO OpenVol. 10(8)
Hacettepe University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Letter re: The efficacy of immunotherapy combined with capecitabine versus immunotherapy alone as maintenance therapy in patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective propensity score matching study — Tahir Kemal Şahin, D C Guven · ESMO Open (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS