Bridging the gap: Multi‐stakeholder perspectives of molecular diagnostics in oncology

Molecular diagnostics has revolutionized cancer management, enabling the identification of diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers. Despite advancements in technologies such as whole genome sequencing, their translation into clinical practice remains challenging due to insufficiently demonstrated clinical utility. This study identifies unmet clinical needs and requirements for innovative molecular technologies in oncology through interviews (n = 22) and an online survey (n = 116), gathering insights from hospital professionals, industry representatives, and health policy and quality assessment experts. Our findings emphasize the increasing importance of liquid biopsies (LBx), particularly plasma-based assays. Key unmet needs in this area include therapy response monitoring, minimal residual disease detection, and predictive biomarker testing. Additionally, we outline technology requirements tailored to diverse clinical biomarker applications and both centralized and decentralized laboratory settings. A central challenge lies in achieving an optimal balance between multiplexing capacity and turnaround time. By bridging the gap between technology development and real-world application, this study paves the way for the implementation of new molecular technologies that better meet the needs of the oncology community, ensuring clinical utility and ultimately improving patient care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Oncology
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.70103
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the gap: Multi‐stakeholder perspectives of molecular diagnostics in oncology

Karen Zwaenepoel, Jorine Arnouts, Léon C.L.T. van Kempen, Karolien De Wael et al.
2 citations
Molecular Oncology
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
1.61
article

Bridging the gap: Multi‐stakeholder perspectives of molecular diagnostics in oncology

Karen Zwaenepoel, Jorine Arnouts, Léon C.L.T. van Kempen, Karolien De Wael, Greetje Vanhoutte, Timon Vandamme, Elise Daems, Senada Koljenović, Marc Peeters
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Molecular diagnostics has revolutionized cancer management, enabling the identification of diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers. Despite advancements in technologies such as whole genome sequencing, their translation into clinical practice remains challenging due to insufficiently demonstrated clinical utility. This study identifies unmet clinical needs and requirements for innovative molecular technologies in oncology through interviews (n = 22) and an online survey (n = 116), gathering insights from hospital professionals, industry representatives, and health policy and quality assessment experts. Our findings emphasize the increasing importance of liquid biopsies (LBx), particularly plasma-based assays. Key unmet needs in this area include therapy response monitoring, minimal residual disease detection, and predictive biomarker testing. Additionally, we outline technology requirements tailored to diverse clinical biomarker applications and both centralized and decentralized laboratory settings. A central challenge lies in achieving an optimal balance between multiplexing capacity and turnaround time. By bridging the gap between technology development and real-world application, this study paves the way for the implementation of new molecular technologies that better meet the needs of the oncology community, ensuring clinical utility and ultimately improving patient care.

Molecular OncologyVol. 20(2)
University of Antwerp (BE), Antwerp University Hospital (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.