Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma in octogenarians and nonagenarians: an individual patient pooled meta-analysis

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a highly common neurosurgical condition with significant burden in the elderly, and patients aged ≥ 80 represent nearly one-third of cases. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has emerged as a promising treatment method to reduce hematoma growth and recurrence; however, octogenarians and nonagenarians remain underrepresented in clinical trials. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data to evaluate outcomes of MMAE in this high-risk group. We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science through March 2025 for studies reporting patients aged ≥ 80 years treated with MMAE for cSDH. Individual-level data were extracted and pooled. Clinical, procedural, and radiographic outcomes were summarized. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression identified predictors of hematoma resolution and extended hospital stay (LOS ≥ 75th percentile). Twenty-six studies including 86 patients (mean age 83 years; 36% ≥90 years) met inclusion. Most were male (70%) and had comorbidities such as hypertension (57%) and diabetes (21%). MMAE was performed alone in 64% of cases and with surgery in 36%. Transfemoral access was used in 74%, while transradial access (associated with shorter LOS) was underutilized, especially in patients ≥ 90 (3%). Complication and in-hospital mortality rates were low (5.8% and 1.2%, respectively). At discharge, 81% returned home. Complete hematoma resolution occurred in 56%, more likely with adjunctive coiling (aOR 4.01) and less likely with antithrombotic use (aOR 0.12). Extended LOS was associated with age ≥ 90 (aOR 2.1) and general anesthesia (aOR 1.7). MMAE is safe and effective in patients aged ≥ 80. While outcomes are favorable across age groups, transradial access and conscious sedation may reduce hospital stay and anesthesia-related risks in this population. Future trials should prioritize inclusion of this high-risk group to guide age-appropriate, evidence-based care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgical Review
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03743-3
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma in octogenarians and nonagenarians: an individual patient pooled meta-analysis

Zachary Hubbard, Felipe Ramirez‐Velandia, Alejandro M Spiotta, Muhammed Amir Essibayi et al.
2 citations
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
2.78
article

Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma in octogenarians and nonagenarians: an individual patient pooled meta-analysis

Zachary Hubbard, Felipe Ramirez‐Velandia, Alejandro M Spiotta, Muhammed Amir Essibayi, Rahim Abo Kasem, Justin H. Granstein, Julio Isidor, Joshua M. Venegas, Omar Alwakaa, Christopher S. Ogilvy, Adnan Rehawi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a highly common neurosurgical condition with significant burden in the elderly, and patients aged ≥ 80 represent nearly one-third of cases. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has emerged as a promising treatment method to reduce hematoma growth and recurrence; however, octogenarians and nonagenarians remain underrepresented in clinical trials. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data to evaluate outcomes of MMAE in this high-risk group. We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science through March 2025 for studies reporting patients aged ≥ 80 years treated with MMAE for cSDH. Individual-level data were extracted and pooled. Clinical, procedural, and radiographic outcomes were summarized. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression identified predictors of hematoma resolution and extended hospital stay (LOS ≥ 75th percentile). Twenty-six studies including 86 patients (mean age 83 years; 36% ≥90 years) met inclusion. Most were male (70%) and had comorbidities such as hypertension (57%) and diabetes (21%). MMAE was performed alone in 64% of cases and with surgery in 36%. Transfemoral access was used in 74%, while transradial access (associated with shorter LOS) was underutilized, especially in patients ≥ 90 (3%). Complication and in-hospital mortality rates were low (5.8% and 1.2%, respectively). At discharge, 81% returned home. Complete hematoma resolution occurred in 56%, more likely with adjunctive coiling (aOR 4.01) and less likely with antithrombotic use (aOR 0.12). Extended LOS was associated with age ≥ 90 (aOR 2.1) and general anesthesia (aOR 1.7). MMAE is safe and effective in patients aged ≥ 80. While outcomes are favorable across age groups, transradial access and conscious sedation may reduce hospital stay and anesthesia-related risks in this population. Future trials should prioritize inclusion of this high-risk group to guide age-appropriate, evidence-based care.

Neurosurgical ReviewVol. 48(1)
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Montefiore Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US), Neurological Surgery (US), Damascus University (SY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.