Role of Questionnaires in the Assessment of Severity and the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Sleep questionnaires are used as screening tools to estimate the presence and severity of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The aim was to prospectively assess the diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of sleep questionnaires (Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Visual Analog Scale for snoring loudness (VAS), Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36), STOP-Bang, and Pittsburgh Quality of Sleep (PSQI)) in subjects who underwent minimally invasive surgery for snoring and OSA. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 49 participants with primary snoring and/or OSA underwent minimally invasive surgery. Pre- and post-operative sleep study parameters and sleep questionnaire results were analyzed to assess the correlation between the subjective and objective parameters before and after surgery and changes with the surgery. <b>Results:</b> Pre-operative sleep study parameters demonstrated: an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of 16.71 ± 9.31, oxygen desaturation index (ODI) of 14.43 ± 9.31, and mean percentage of snoring time (ST) of 17.26 ± 14.5%, ESS of 9.04 ± 5.76, VAS of 8.18 ± 1.93, SF-36 of 42.12 ± 22.86, STOP-Bang of 3.65 ± 1.13, and PSQI of 6.61 ± 3.23. Post-operative sleep study parameters demonstrated an AHI of 10.39 ± 7.86, ODI of 10.17 ± 7.78, and ST of 12.55 ± 13.36%, ESS of 6.61 ± 4.55, VAS of 4.13 ± 2.87, SF-36 of 42.45 ± 24.70, STOP-Bang of 2.49 ± 1.42, and PSQI of 4.98 ± 2.13. Changes with surgery for sleep parameters demonstrated a decrease in AHI: 37.83%, ODI: 29.52%, ST: 27.3%, ESS: 26.86%, VAS: 49.50%, PSQI: 24.69%, and STOP-Bang: 31.84%. The score of SF-36 was not significant. <b>Conclusions:</b> Sleep questionnaires are an essential component of the workup for patients with snoring and OSA. There are differences in their ability to identify the presence and quantify the severity of snoring and OSA when compared to objective sleep parameters. Their sensitivity in assessing changes with treatment also varies.