Can the nutritional geometric framework unveil how macronutrients in pollen shape solitary bee foraging and survival?

The nutritional geometric framework (NGF) hypothesizes that animals forage to achieve specific macronutrient ratios. Pollen, the primary source of protein and lipids for bees, varies in nutritional content across plant species. Studies suggest some bumblebee species forage based on species-specific macronutrient preferences, regardless of floral traits. Here, we examine whether females of the solitary bee species, <i>Megachile rotundata</i>, also follow the NGF when foraging. In a semi-field experiment using <i>Capsella</i> recombinant inbred plant lines with varying pollen protein-to-lipid (P : L) ratios, <i>M. rotundata</i> visits were positively associated with pollen protein content. In a laboratory-based study using synthetic diets with varying P : L ratios, female <i>M. rotundata</i> consumed the most and survived longest on diets with intermediate P : L ratios (5 : 1 and 10 : 1). Paired-choice experiments further revealed that bees regulated nutrient intake, converging on an average intake of 6.6 : 1 ± 1.6 P : L. These results suggest that <i>M. rotundata</i> exhibits a clear macronutrient preference and regulation behaviour, optimizing nutrient intake consistent with a functional nutritional target. Understanding how macronutrients influence foraging preferences and health outcomes in diverse bee species is crucial for understanding how plant-pollinator networks evolved and creating habitats beneficial for diverse pollinators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.251093
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can the nutritional geometric framework unveil how macronutrients in pollen shape solitary bee foraging and survival?

Christina M. Grozinger, Pierre Ouvrard, Natalie K. Boyle, Jaya Sravanthi Mokkapati et al.
2 citations
Royal Society Open Science
Plant and animal studies
6.05
article

Can the nutritional geometric framework unveil how macronutrients in pollen shape solitary bee foraging and survival?

Christina M. Grozinger, Pierre Ouvrard, Natalie K. Boyle, Jaya Sravanthi Mokkapati, Adrien Sicard
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The nutritional geometric framework (NGF) hypothesizes that animals forage to achieve specific macronutrient ratios. Pollen, the primary source of protein and lipids for bees, varies in nutritional content across plant species. Studies suggest some bumblebee species forage based on species-specific macronutrient preferences, regardless of floral traits. Here, we examine whether females of the solitary bee species, <i>Megachile rotundata</i>, also follow the NGF when foraging. In a semi-field experiment using <i>Capsella</i> recombinant inbred plant lines with varying pollen protein-to-lipid (P : L) ratios, <i>M. rotundata</i> visits were positively associated with pollen protein content. In a laboratory-based study using synthetic diets with varying P : L ratios, female <i>M. rotundata</i> consumed the most and survived longest on diets with intermediate P : L ratios (5 : 1 and 10 : 1). Paired-choice experiments further revealed that bees regulated nutrient intake, converging on an average intake of 6.6 : 1 ± 1.6 P : L. These results suggest that <i>M. rotundata</i> exhibits a clear macronutrient preference and regulation behaviour, optimizing nutrient intake consistent with a functional nutritional target. Understanding how macronutrients influence foraging preferences and health outcomes in diverse bee species is crucial for understanding how plant-pollinator networks evolved and creating habitats beneficial for diverse pollinators.

Royal Society Open ScienceVol. 12(8)
Uppsala University (SE), Pennsylvania State University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Human Frontier Science Program, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Plant and animal studies
6.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.