Influence of isoflurane and propofol on gastric slow wave patterns and pacing efficacy in pigs

Gut motility is partly driven by underlying rhythmic electrical activity called slow waves. The origin and propagation of these electrical events are studied extensively in anesthetized animal models. However, the effects of anesthesia on slow waves remain unclear. This study examined how propofol and isoflurane influence spatiotemporal features of gastric slow waves, anterior-posterior coupling, and the efficacy of gastric pacing. Pigs were anesthetized with propofol (<i>n</i> = 7) and isoflurane (<i>n</i> = 8), and baseline electrical activity was measured using high-resolution surface-contact electrode arrays placed on the anterior and posterior gastric serosa. Following baseline recordings, pacing was applied to assess its effects. Slow wave propagation patterns were quantified, and the efficacy of spatial entrainment during pacing was compared under propofol and isoflurane. Under propofol, antegrade propagation was observed with 86% symmetry between anterior and posterior gastric surfaces, whereas isoflurane reduced symmetry to 25% (<i>P</i> = 0.0187) with propagation patterns frequently changing. Slow wave period (18.8 ± 5.1 vs. 28.1 ± 14.3 s, <i>P</i> = 0.016), amplitude (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 0.7 ± 0.4 mV, <i>P</i> = 0.002), and speed (4.4 ± 1.1 vs. 3.5 ± 0.7 mm/s, <i>P</i> = 0.018) differed significantly between anesthetic groups at baseline, whereas only amplitude and speed differed during pacing. Spatial entrainment success was higher with propofol (83%) than with isoflurane (57%), but pacing effects remained localized to the paced surface without propagation across the greater curvature. Isoflurane induced more gastric dysrhythmias than propofol, making propofol preferable for studying normal activity and isoflurane preferred for investigating therapies. The uncoupling of anterior and posterior surfaces suggests a potential electrical barrier at the greater curvature, warranting further investigation.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> The influence of propofol and isoflurane on the spatial propagation of gastric slow wave activity under baseline and pacing conditions was defined for the first time. Slow waves were significantly ordered and coupled across the anterior and posterior surfaces of the stomach under propofol compared with isoflurane. Slow waves entrained during pacing were confined to the surface where pacing was applied, suggesting an electrical barrier along the greater curvature of the stomach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00123.2025
Primary Topic
Ion channel regulation and function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of isoflurane and propofol on gastric slow wave patterns and pacing efficacy in pigs

Jack M. Rogers, Peng Du, Leo K. Cheng, Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel et al.
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
Ion channel regulation and function
article

Influence of isoflurane and propofol on gastric slow wave patterns and pacing efficacy in pigs

Jack M. Rogers, Peng Du, Leo K. Cheng, Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel, Haley N. Patton, Nipuni D. Nagahawatte, Hanyu Zhang
article en

Abstract

Gut motility is partly driven by underlying rhythmic electrical activity called slow waves. The origin and propagation of these electrical events are studied extensively in anesthetized animal models. However, the effects of anesthesia on slow waves remain unclear. This study examined how propofol and isoflurane influence spatiotemporal features of gastric slow waves, anterior-posterior coupling, and the efficacy of gastric pacing. Pigs were anesthetized with propofol (<i>n</i> = 7) and isoflurane (<i>n</i> = 8), and baseline electrical activity was measured using high-resolution surface-contact electrode arrays placed on the anterior and posterior gastric serosa. Following baseline recordings, pacing was applied to assess its effects. Slow wave propagation patterns were quantified, and the efficacy of spatial entrainment during pacing was compared under propofol and isoflurane. Under propofol, antegrade propagation was observed with 86% symmetry between anterior and posterior gastric surfaces, whereas isoflurane reduced symmetry to 25% (<i>P</i> = 0.0187) with propagation patterns frequently changing. Slow wave period (18.8 ± 5.1 vs. 28.1 ± 14.3 s, <i>P</i> = 0.016), amplitude (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 0.7 ± 0.4 mV, <i>P</i> = 0.002), and speed (4.4 ± 1.1 vs. 3.5 ± 0.7 mm/s, <i>P</i> = 0.018) differed significantly between anesthetic groups at baseline, whereas only amplitude and speed differed during pacing. Spatial entrainment success was higher with propofol (83%) than with isoflurane (57%), but pacing effects remained localized to the paced surface without propagation across the greater curvature. Isoflurane induced more gastric dysrhythmias than propofol, making propofol preferable for studying normal activity and isoflurane preferred for investigating therapies. The uncoupling of anterior and posterior surfaces suggests a potential electrical barrier at the greater curvature, warranting further investigation.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> The influence of propofol and isoflurane on the spatial propagation of gastric slow wave activity under baseline and pacing conditions was defined for the first time. Slow waves were significantly ordered and coupled across the anterior and posterior surfaces of the stomach under propofol compared with isoflurane. Slow waves entrained during pacing were confined to the surface where pacing was applied, suggesting an electrical barrier along the greater curvature of the stomach.

American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver PhysiologyVol. 329(3)
University of Auckland (NZ), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Marsden Fund, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Ion channel regulation and function
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.