Increased Soil Greenhouse Gas Emissions From the Combined Use of Cover Crops and No‐Tillage in Producer‐Managed Fields

Abstract Cover crop adoption offers multiple benefits and climate mitigation potential for agroecosystems, but is still an underutilized conservation practice. Recently, the combined use of cover cropping plus no‐tillage (CCNT) has been increasingly promoted to achieve its synergistic effectiveness. Yet, how this combined practice affects soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emission remains a topic of debate. Existing studies are predominantly based on research‐managed settings and often fail to assess all three major GHGs of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), nitrous oxide (N 2 O), and methane (CH 4 ). To address these knowledge gaps, this study conducted a 30‐month monitoring from producer‐managed fields to quantify the soil greenhouse gas responses to CCNT compared to no‐tillage (NT) alone. The findings showed that CCNT increased the soil global warming potential (GWP) by 15.2% relative to NT. CO 2 is the main contributor, accounting for over 91.7% of the total GWP. On average, the daily fluxes of CO 2 , N 2 O, and CH 4 were increased by 16.2%, 32.3%, and 55.6% under CCNT, respectively. Meteorological variables explained 85.3% of the CO 2 increase and 46.1% of the N 2 O increase associated with CCNT. Furthermore, two types of CCNT practices differed in GHG emission responses, though both strategies significantly reduced nitrogen losses. These quantitative results, derived from actual production systems, provide informed decision‐making among local producers regarding the adoption of cover crops. Moreover, this field‐based evidence offers a robust empirical foundation for future modeling efforts aimed at assessing the ecological benefits of cover crops under varying climatic and soil conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth s Future
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025ef006009
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Increased Soil Greenhouse Gas Emissions From the Combined Use of Cover Crops and No‐Tillage in Producer‐Managed Fields

Pierre-André Jacinthe, Yu Peng, Edward G. Dobrowolski, Lixin Wang
Earth s Future
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Increased Soil Greenhouse Gas Emissions From the Combined Use of Cover Crops and No‐Tillage in Producer‐Managed Fields

Pierre-André Jacinthe, Yu Peng, Edward G. Dobrowolski, Lixin Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Cover crop adoption offers multiple benefits and climate mitigation potential for agroecosystems, but is still an underutilized conservation practice. Recently, the combined use of cover cropping plus no‐tillage (CCNT) has been increasingly promoted to achieve its synergistic effectiveness. Yet, how this combined practice affects soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emission remains a topic of debate. Existing studies are predominantly based on research‐managed settings and often fail to assess all three major GHGs of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), nitrous oxide (N 2 O), and methane (CH 4 ). To address these knowledge gaps, this study conducted a 30‐month monitoring from producer‐managed fields to quantify the soil greenhouse gas responses to CCNT compared to no‐tillage (NT) alone. The findings showed that CCNT increased the soil global warming potential (GWP) by 15.2% relative to NT. CO 2 is the main contributor, accounting for over 91.7% of the total GWP. On average, the daily fluxes of CO 2 , N 2 O, and CH 4 were increased by 16.2%, 32.3%, and 55.6% under CCNT, respectively. Meteorological variables explained 85.3% of the CO 2 increase and 46.1% of the N 2 O increase associated with CCNT. Furthermore, two types of CCNT practices differed in GHG emission responses, though both strategies significantly reduced nitrogen losses. These quantitative results, derived from actual production systems, provide informed decision‐making among local producers regarding the adoption of cover crops. Moreover, this field‐based evidence offers a robust empirical foundation for future modeling efforts aimed at assessing the ecological benefits of cover crops under varying climatic and soil conditions.

Earth s FutureVol. 13(8)
Indiana Geological and Water Survey (US), Indiana University Indianapolis (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.