Can we use APSIM’s embedded expert knowledge to ‘train’ a machine learning model to identify, at high resolution, land suitable to grow lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) using simplified climate data?

Using low-producing resident pasture lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) is a proven method to increase pastoral on-farm productivity, and minimize environment impacts. Locating suitable areas for lucerne production requires land suitability evaluation. This proof-of-concept study develops machine-learning (ML) models for land suitability that learn from predictions of lucerne dry matter yields from the Agricultural Production Systems Simulator (APSIM) Next Gen lucerne model. This detailed mechanistic model was used to simulate lucerne crop growth using spatially-coarse-resolution daily-climate data and three generic soil types. The ML models are developed using the resulting estimates of lucerne production but with spatially-high-resolution annually-aggregated climate data. The aim is to test if this much simplified climate data in combination with ML modeling could be used for efficient land evaluation. The second aim is to investigate the interpretability of the ML models. Four ML models, Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN), were trained and validated using integrated annual climate data. ML models consistently achieved higher overall performance with two types of generic loam soil (MEC > 0.8, RMSE < 2 tons/ha), than simulations with generic stony sand soil (MEC > 0.6, RMSE < 3 tons⁄ha). Using Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), the predictors contribution to the models and the plant-environment interactions were uncovered from the ‘black-box’ ML models. Complex ML models (RF, GBM, and ANN), revealed the nonlinear interaction between lucerne production and underlying climate, which the linear model (MLR) was unable to capture. The trained ML model achieved high accuracy (MEC > 0.89, RMSE < 1.3 tons/ha) when predicting with independent high spatial resolution (100 m) annual climate data. The model discovered altitude effects on lucerne production by showing the strong correlation (R > 0.84, p < 0.001) between the two. Our study demonstrated that lightweight ML models can effectively assess lucerne land suitability at 100 m resolution, while also acknowledging limitations from generic soils, single-cultivar calibration, and model performance, with suggestions for future improvement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Agronomy
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2025.127815
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can we use APSIM’s embedded expert knowledge to ‘train’ a machine learning model to identify, at high resolution, land suitable to grow lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) using simplified climate data?

Linda Lilburne, Edmar Teixeira, Derrick J. Moot, Teng Fei et al.
1 citations
European Journal of Agronomy
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.72
article

Can we use APSIM’s embedded expert knowledge to ‘train’ a machine learning model to identify, at high resolution, land suitable to grow lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) using simplified climate data?

Linda Lilburne, Edmar Teixeira, Derrick J. Moot, Teng Fei, Xiumei Yang, Jing Guo, Man Yang, Brent Martin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Using low-producing resident pasture lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) is a proven method to increase pastoral on-farm productivity, and minimize environment impacts. Locating suitable areas for lucerne production requires land suitability evaluation. This proof-of-concept study develops machine-learning (ML) models for land suitability that learn from predictions of lucerne dry matter yields from the Agricultural Production Systems Simulator (APSIM) Next Gen lucerne model. This detailed mechanistic model was used to simulate lucerne crop growth using spatially-coarse-resolution daily-climate data and three generic soil types. The ML models are developed using the resulting estimates of lucerne production but with spatially-high-resolution annually-aggregated climate data. The aim is to test if this much simplified climate data in combination with ML modeling could be used for efficient land evaluation. The second aim is to investigate the interpretability of the ML models. Four ML models, Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN), were trained and validated using integrated annual climate data. ML models consistently achieved higher overall performance with two types of generic loam soil (MEC > 0.8, RMSE < 2 tons/ha), than simulations with generic stony sand soil (MEC > 0.6, RMSE < 3 tons⁄ha). Using Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), the predictors contribution to the models and the plant-environment interactions were uncovered from the ‘black-box’ ML models. Complex ML models (RF, GBM, and ANN), revealed the nonlinear interaction between lucerne production and underlying climate, which the linear model (MLR) was unable to capture. The trained ML model achieved high accuracy (MEC > 0.89, RMSE < 1.3 tons/ha) when predicting with independent high spatial resolution (100 m) annual climate data. The model discovered altitude effects on lucerne production by showing the strong correlation (R > 0.84, p < 0.001) between the two. Our study demonstrated that lightweight ML models can effectively assess lucerne land suitability at 100 m resolution, while also acknowledging limitations from generic soils, single-cultivar calibration, and model performance, with suggestions for future improvement.

European Journal of AgronomyVol. 171
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, Ministry for Business Innovation and Employment, Serono Symposia International Foundation
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.