Pathways to Safeguarding Digital Sovereignty Within a Multi‐Level Governance Framework: A Cross‐National Comparative Study Based on the FsQCA Method

ABSTRACT As global digitalization and cybersecurity threats intensify, digital sovereignty has become increasingly significant as a vital component of national security and economic independence. Utilizing the fuzzy‐set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method and through data from 30 countries, the study identifies internal stability‐driven, externally driven, comprehensively coordinated, and externally dependent pathways to achieving digital sovereignty. These four pathways reveal how countries effectively safeguard their digital sovereignty under different contexts through combinations of international cooperation (IC), legal framework (LF), and technological capability (TC). The study finds that IC, as a universal condition, plays a pivotal role in all pathways, acting both as a “binding agent” in multi‐level governance to connect diverse stakeholders and as a “leveraging factor” to amplify the effects of other conditions. This study not only enriches the theoretical foundation of digital sovereignty, highlighting the necessity of understanding the complexity and diversity of multi‐factor combinations in digital governance, but also provides practical references for the formulation and implementation of digital sovereignty policies on a global scale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy & Internet
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.70009
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pathways to Safeguarding Digital Sovereignty Within a Multi‐Level Governance Framework: A Cross‐National Comparative Study Based on the FsQCA Method

Jinghong Xu, Yuhang Yuan, Runze Qu
2 citations
Policy & Internet
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
8.40
article

Pathways to Safeguarding Digital Sovereignty Within a Multi‐Level Governance Framework: A Cross‐National Comparative Study Based on the FsQCA Method

Jinghong Xu, Yuhang Yuan, Runze Qu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT As global digitalization and cybersecurity threats intensify, digital sovereignty has become increasingly significant as a vital component of national security and economic independence. Utilizing the fuzzy‐set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method and through data from 30 countries, the study identifies internal stability‐driven, externally driven, comprehensively coordinated, and externally dependent pathways to achieving digital sovereignty. These four pathways reveal how countries effectively safeguard their digital sovereignty under different contexts through combinations of international cooperation (IC), legal framework (LF), and technological capability (TC). The study finds that IC, as a universal condition, plays a pivotal role in all pathways, acting both as a “binding agent” in multi‐level governance to connect diverse stakeholders and as a “leveraging factor” to amplify the effects of other conditions. This study not only enriches the theoretical foundation of digital sovereignty, highlighting the necessity of understanding the complexity and diversity of multi‐factor combinations in digital governance, but also provides practical references for the formulation and implementation of digital sovereignty policies on a global scale.

Policy & InternetVol. 17(3)
Beijing Normal University (CN), Krirk University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.