Blowback: When China’s Belt and Road Initiative Meets Democratic Institutions

Abstract China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has two interconnected goals: increasing China’s diplomatic clout and expanding the presence of Chinese companies overseas. However, contrary to the intuitive notion that good diplomacy creates economic opportunities, we argue that when the partner country is a democracy, these goals conflict. First, we hypothesize and quantitatively uncover a negative relationship between host state democratic institutions and infrastructure contracts won by Chinese firms overseas. Second, we test whether host states’ joining the BRI affects contract volumes. Our results indicate that in states with more democratic institutions, host government joining of the BRI is negatively associated with infrastructure contracts for Chinese companies, pointing to blowback in democracies against the BRI. This study contributes to understanding the complex relationship between diplomacy and commerce, the domestic politics of foreign countries in shaping Chinese foreign policy, and the factors driving China's overseas infrastructure contracting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Studies Quarterly
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaf014
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blowback: When China’s Belt and Road Initiative Meets Democratic Institutions

Andrea Ghiselli, Pippa Morgan
1 citations
International Studies Quarterly
International Development and Aid
1.40
article

Blowback: When China’s Belt and Road Initiative Meets Democratic Institutions

Andrea Ghiselli, Pippa Morgan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has two interconnected goals: increasing China’s diplomatic clout and expanding the presence of Chinese companies overseas. However, contrary to the intuitive notion that good diplomacy creates economic opportunities, we argue that when the partner country is a democracy, these goals conflict. First, we hypothesize and quantitatively uncover a negative relationship between host state democratic institutions and infrastructure contracts won by Chinese firms overseas. Second, we test whether host states’ joining the BRI affects contract volumes. Our results indicate that in states with more democratic institutions, host government joining of the BRI is negatively associated with infrastructure contracts for Chinese companies, pointing to blowback in democracies against the BRI. This study contributes to understanding the complex relationship between diplomacy and commerce, the domestic politics of foreign countries in shaping Chinese foreign policy, and the factors driving China's overseas infrastructure contracting.

International Studies QuarterlyVol. 69(1)
University of Exeter (GB), Duke Kunshan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
International Development and Aid
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.