Problem officers and problem behavior: on the object of early intervention systems

Abstract The development, refinement, and assessment of early intervention (EI) systems for police misconduct turn on the conceptualization and operationalization of problem behavior. Recent research has applied different conceptualizations and operationalizations of problem behavior: behavior that results in involuntary separation or severe discipline, or a single “adverse event.” These constructs have the virtue of enabling measurement in terms of data that are normally available. However, their correspondence to problem behavior is questionable, raising the prospect that program development would be misdirected. In this paper we assess and compare these two definitions of problem behavior against a third: officers who meet an early intervention system threshold and are determined upon review to warrant intervention. We analyze the congruence of the three operationalizations and the patterns of risk-related outputs associated with officers thusly categorized through the operation of two agencies’ systems. We draw lessons for the further development of EI systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paaf002
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Problem officers and problem behavior: on the object of early intervention systems

Robert E. Worden, Christopher J. Harris, Kenan M Worden, Sarah J. McLean
3 citations
Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice
Crime Patterns and Interventions
12.60
article

Problem officers and problem behavior: on the object of early intervention systems

Robert E. Worden, Christopher J. Harris, Kenan M Worden, Sarah J. McLean
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The development, refinement, and assessment of early intervention (EI) systems for police misconduct turn on the conceptualization and operationalization of problem behavior. Recent research has applied different conceptualizations and operationalizations of problem behavior: behavior that results in involuntary separation or severe discipline, or a single “adverse event.” These constructs have the virtue of enabling measurement in terms of data that are normally available. However, their correspondence to problem behavior is questionable, raising the prospect that program development would be misdirected. In this paper we assess and compare these two definitions of problem behavior against a third: officers who meet an early intervention system threshold and are determined upon review to warrant intervention. We analyze the congruence of the three operationalizations and the patterns of risk-related outputs associated with officers thusly categorized through the operation of two agencies’ systems. We draw lessons for the further development of EI systems.

Policing A Journal of Policy and PracticeVol. 19
Albany State University (US), University of Massachusetts Lowell (US), University at Albany, State University of New York (US), John F Finn Institute for Public Safety (US)
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Crime Patterns and Interventions
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.