Brucellosis surveillance in Bavarian wild boar: Evaluation of a novel rLPS/sLPS-based ELISA compared to OIE-listed serological tests
A dual-step diagnostic approach - utilizing a sensitive ELISA for screening followed by CFT for confirmation - remains the most effective strategy for wildlife surveillance. The BSI ELISA may serve as a viable alternative in clinical or resource-limited settings. Continued monitoring is crucial to mitigate the zoonotic risk posed by wildlife reservoirs.
Authors
- J Borde (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1175-4778)
- Philipp Girl (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1370-4114)
- Leonard Limpinsel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0226-1170)
- Julia M. Riehm (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0767-5217)
- Gerhard Dobler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7461-293X)
Institutions
- University of Hohenheim (DE)
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
- LMU Klinikum (DE)
- Universität der Bundeswehr München (DE)
- Health and Safety Authority (IE)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Veterinary Microbiology
- Published
- 2025-08-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2025.110679
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.35
Funders
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München