World Health Organization Event-Based Surveillance During the First 4 Months of the 2022 Ukraine Crisis

Following a nearly decade-long war in Eastern Ukraine, the conflict escalated in February 2022, and the World Health Organization swiftly began enhanced event-based surveillance (EBS) for the early detection of public health threats in Ukraine and refugee-hosting countries. The aim of this study was to assess the characteristics and trends of signals documented by WHO, especially examining how potential threats to human health in Ukraine and other affected countries were identified and presented during the first 4 months of the Ukraine crisis. The EBS process relied on the daily screening of information coming from different sources, and signals were categorized by public health risks. Between February 26 and June 30, 2022, a total of 208,484 articles were screened in the Epidemic Intelligence from Open Sources system and other sources, identifying 832 recorded signals. Most (94.1%) signals were reported within 2 days of publication of the relevant pieces of information. The most common categories of signals reported were "healthcare capacity" (n=283, 34.0%), followed by "technological hazards" (n=129, 15.5%), "population movement" (n=80, 9.6%), and "infectious diseases" (n=79, 9.5%). Among all signals, 85.5% were relevant to Ukraine. In Ukraine, the largest number of signals (20.4%) were reported from the city of Donetska. Although, resource intensiveness and appropriate balance for desired sensitivity and scope remains a challenge, EBS remains a vital surveillance method to rapidly identify potential health threats during public health events and humanitarian crises-when routine surveillance is weak or disrupted-and to contribute crucial data to guide health information management and planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Security
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23265094251363918
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health and Conflict Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

World Health Organization Event-Based Surveillance During the First 4 Months of the 2022 Ukraine Crisis

Olivier le Polain de Waroux, Altaf Musani, Maria Elizabeth Mitri, Juniorcaius Ikejezie et al.
1 citations
Health Security
Health and Conflict Studies
2.82
article

World Health Organization Event-Based Surveillance During the First 4 Months of the 2022 Ukraine Crisis

Olivier le Polain de Waroux, Altaf Musani, Maria Elizabeth Mitri, Juniorcaius Ikejezie, Heather Papowitz, Bernadette Basuta Mirembe, Abdi Rahman Mahamud, Emily Meyer, Ojong Ojong Ejoh, Boris Pavlin, А. В. Ковальчук, Kazuki Shimizu, Silviu Ciobanu, Liudmyla Slobodianyk, Zyleen Kassamali, Aron Kassahun Aregay, Veronica Cristea, Ingrid Hammermeister Nezu, Friday Idoko, Brian Ngongheh Ajong, Grace Brough, Sarah Mesbah Abdulhady
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Following a nearly decade-long war in Eastern Ukraine, the conflict escalated in February 2022, and the World Health Organization swiftly began enhanced event-based surveillance (EBS) for the early detection of public health threats in Ukraine and refugee-hosting countries. The aim of this study was to assess the characteristics and trends of signals documented by WHO, especially examining how potential threats to human health in Ukraine and other affected countries were identified and presented during the first 4 months of the Ukraine crisis. The EBS process relied on the daily screening of information coming from different sources, and signals were categorized by public health risks. Between February 26 and June 30, 2022, a total of 208,484 articles were screened in the Epidemic Intelligence from Open Sources system and other sources, identifying 832 recorded signals. Most (94.1%) signals were reported within 2 days of publication of the relevant pieces of information. The most common categories of signals reported were "healthcare capacity" (n=283, 34.0%), followed by "technological hazards" (n=129, 15.5%), "population movement" (n=80, 9.6%), and "infectious diseases" (n=79, 9.5%). Among all signals, 85.5% were relevant to Ukraine. In Ukraine, the largest number of signals (20.4%) were reported from the city of Donetska. Although, resource intensiveness and appropriate balance for desired sensitivity and scope remains a challenge, EBS remains a vital surveillance method to rapidly identify potential health threats during public health events and humanitarian crises-when routine surveillance is weak or disrupted-and to contribute crucial data to guide health information management and planning.

Health SecurityVol. 23(4)
Shimadzu (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Health and Conflict Studies
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.