Evaluating the use of SPIRIT on participant retention in randomised trials: Challenges in reporting and implications for practice

SPIRIT item 18b appeared not to contribute to improved participant retention rates in randomised trials. However, the lack of high-certainty evidence for effectiveness of the intervention strategies cited likely impacts this finding. Additionally, inconsistent reporting of retention strategies in trial protocols is evident and needs to be more complete to facilitate evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327110
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the use of SPIRIT on participant retention in randomised trials: Challenges in reporting and implications for practice

Frances Shiely, Ellen K. Murphy, Anita O’Connor
PLoS ONE
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Evaluating the use of SPIRIT on participant retention in randomised trials: Challenges in reporting and implications for practice

Frances Shiely, Ellen K. Murphy, Anita O’Connor
article en

Abstract

SPIRIT item 18b appeared not to contribute to improved participant retention rates in randomised trials. However, the lack of high-certainty evidence for effectiveness of the intervention strategies cited likely impacts this finding. Additionally, inconsistent reporting of retention strategies in trial protocols is evident and needs to be more complete to facilitate evaluation.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(8)
University College Cork (IE), Health Research Board (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.