A Single-Site Qualitative Study Exploring What Cancer Patients and Health Care Professionals Consider to be the Core Priorities in Relation to Psychosocial Cancer Care

IntroductionA cancer diagnosis often impacts emotional wellbeing, with patients frequently reporting unmet psychosocial needs throughout their care pathway. Needs-based support can help address these challenges, but barriers exist that limit its uptake by patients and its provision by health care professionals (HCPs). Identifying key aspects of psychosocial support and tailoring this to meet the preferences and priorities of the individual can enhance the patient-centredness of care, improving both patient outcomes and HCP job satisfaction.AimThis study aimed to explore what cancer patients and HCPs consider to be the core priorities in relation to psychosocial cancer care.MethodSemi-structured interviews were conducted with cancer patients and HCPs at a single UK cancer centre to explore the research question. Interview transcripts were analysed using Framework Analysis to identify and interpret key themes.ResultsA total of 21 interviews (10 with patients, 11 with HCPs) were analysed. Six cross-cutting themes were generated from the data: <i>personalised support, awareness and accessibility of support, patient-HCP communication, coordination of care, time and resource constraints,</i> and <i>'what matters most' in psychosocial cancer care</i>. HCP-specific themes were <i>recognition of HCPs' own psychosocial needs</i> and <i>the necessity for education and training in psychosocial care.</i>ConclusionPsychosocial care is pivotal to cancer patients' wellbeing and positively influences their perceptions of health, especially when this aligns with their individual needs and preferences. Cross-cutting themes highlighted the importance of holistic approaches addressing the multifaceted needs of patients and indicated alignment between patient and HCP care priorities. Supporting HCPs' own wellbeing and providing appropriate training and skill development may further enhance the quality of psychosocial care delivery. Implementing a stepped-care approach may enable practitioners to better support their patients which in turn will improve their job satisfaction and patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Control
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748251356320
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Single-Site Qualitative Study Exploring What Cancer Patients and Health Care Professionals Consider to be the Core Priorities in Relation to Psychosocial Cancer Care

Sophie Otter, Victoria Mumford, Jenny Harris, Robert B. MacArthur et al.
1 citations
Cancer Control
Cancer survivorship and care
1.05
article

A Single-Site Qualitative Study Exploring What Cancer Patients and Health Care Professionals Consider to be the Core Priorities in Relation to Psychosocial Cancer Care

Sophie Otter, Victoria Mumford, Jenny Harris, Robert B. MacArthur, May Teoh, Jo Armes, Zoe Clothier, Agnieszka Kehinde, Kate Upshon, Clare Williamson, R. Stevenson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

IntroductionA cancer diagnosis often impacts emotional wellbeing, with patients frequently reporting unmet psychosocial needs throughout their care pathway. Needs-based support can help address these challenges, but barriers exist that limit its uptake by patients and its provision by health care professionals (HCPs). Identifying key aspects of psychosocial support and tailoring this to meet the preferences and priorities of the individual can enhance the patient-centredness of care, improving both patient outcomes and HCP job satisfaction.AimThis study aimed to explore what cancer patients and HCPs consider to be the core priorities in relation to psychosocial cancer care.MethodSemi-structured interviews were conducted with cancer patients and HCPs at a single UK cancer centre to explore the research question. Interview transcripts were analysed using Framework Analysis to identify and interpret key themes.ResultsA total of 21 interviews (10 with patients, 11 with HCPs) were analysed. Six cross-cutting themes were generated from the data: <i>personalised support, awareness and accessibility of support, patient-HCP communication, coordination of care, time and resource constraints,</i> and <i>'what matters most' in psychosocial cancer care</i>. HCP-specific themes were <i>recognition of HCPs' own psychosocial needs</i> and <i>the necessity for education and training in psychosocial care.</i>ConclusionPsychosocial care is pivotal to cancer patients' wellbeing and positively influences their perceptions of health, especially when this aligns with their individual needs and preferences. Cross-cutting themes highlighted the importance of holistic approaches addressing the multifaceted needs of patients and indicated alignment between patient and HCP care priorities. Supporting HCPs' own wellbeing and providing appropriate training and skill development may further enhance the quality of psychosocial care delivery. Implementing a stepped-care approach may enable practitioners to better support their patients which in turn will improve their job satisfaction and patient outcomes.

Cancer ControlVol. 32
University of Surrey (GB), Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
University of Surrey
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Cancer survivorship and care
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.