The proportion of genetic similarity for liability for neuroticism in mother–child and mother–father dyads is associated with reported relationship quality

This study aims to explore the influence of genetic similarity for neuroticism liability in mother's reported quality of relationship with her child and partner. Such understanding could provide insight into the role of genetic similarity in neuroticism liability in close relationships. Molecular genetic data in 4,704 mothers, partners, and children in the Avon Longitudinal Study Parents And Children (ALSPAC) study were used to derive the proportion of genetic similarity in neuroticism liability between mother and child, and mother and partner, for genetic variants associated with neuroticism. Associations between genetic similarity in neuroticism liability scores and mothers' reported enjoyment and conflict in the parenting relationship (child ages 0-3) and her reported partner relationship were examined. For a one standard deviation (SD) increase in similarity in mother and child genetic variants associated with neuroticism, there was a 0.15SD (95%CI = 0.003 to 0.500, p = 0.046) increase in maternal reported enjoyment in their relationship. This association was greater where mother and child were both in the top quartile for high neuroticism (standardised beta = 0.29, 95%CI = 0.02 to 0.56, p = 0.034). Similar patterns of results emerged for similarity for genetic variants associated with neuroticism between mothers and partners, and the quality of the mother-partner relationship. These results highlight how phenotypic variation (i.e. the link between PGS scores and mothers reported enjoyment) linked to genetic liability in one individual may be linked with the genetic liability of those around them (i.e. the genetic liability of the infant). In other words, parenting and intimate partner relationships as perceived by the mother were explained not by one or the other's genetic score, but by the similarity between them These exploratory findings present an intriguing mechanism by which similarity between genetic liability might be linked to family relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14137-2
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The proportion of genetic similarity for liability for neuroticism in mother–child and mother–father dyads is associated with reported relationship quality

Elizabeth Braithwaite, Deborah James, Tim Cadman, Iryna Culpin et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
4.24
article

The proportion of genetic similarity for liability for neuroticism in mother–child and mother–father dyads is associated with reported relationship quality

Elizabeth Braithwaite, Deborah James, Tim Cadman, Iryna Culpin, Marc H. Bornstein, Rebecca M. Pearson, Alex S. F. Kwong, Miguel Cordero, Ilaria Costantini, Hannah Sallis, Hannah Jones
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study aims to explore the influence of genetic similarity for neuroticism liability in mother's reported quality of relationship with her child and partner. Such understanding could provide insight into the role of genetic similarity in neuroticism liability in close relationships. Molecular genetic data in 4,704 mothers, partners, and children in the Avon Longitudinal Study Parents And Children (ALSPAC) study were used to derive the proportion of genetic similarity in neuroticism liability between mother and child, and mother and partner, for genetic variants associated with neuroticism. Associations between genetic similarity in neuroticism liability scores and mothers' reported enjoyment and conflict in the parenting relationship (child ages 0-3) and her reported partner relationship were examined. For a one standard deviation (SD) increase in similarity in mother and child genetic variants associated with neuroticism, there was a 0.15SD (95%CI = 0.003 to 0.500, p = 0.046) increase in maternal reported enjoyment in their relationship. This association was greater where mother and child were both in the top quartile for high neuroticism (standardised beta = 0.29, 95%CI = 0.02 to 0.56, p = 0.034). Similar patterns of results emerged for similarity for genetic variants associated with neuroticism between mothers and partners, and the quality of the mother-partner relationship. These results highlight how phenotypic variation (i.e. the link between PGS scores and mothers reported enjoyment) linked to genetic liability in one individual may be linked with the genetic liability of those around them (i.e. the genetic liability of the infant). In other words, parenting and intimate partner relationships as perceived by the mother were explained not by one or the other's genetic score, but by the similarity between them These exploratory findings present an intriguing mechanism by which similarity between genetic liability might be linked to family relationships.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), University of Copenhagen (DK), Universidad del Desarrollo (CL), Institute for Fiscal Studies (GB), King's College London (GB), Florence Nightingale Foundation (GB), Clínica Alemana (CL), University of Bristol (GB), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (US), University of Edinburgh (GB)
European Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
4.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.