A new method for automated olfactory threshold testing

We present a new method for fully self-administered olfactory testing. Technical development and testing and 2 user studies were conducted to test the functionality of a prototype device called Automated Olfactory Threshold Test (AutomOT). Technical testing showed repeatable functioning of the developed olfactory display technology in accurately producing 11 predefined odor intensity levels over 10 different days. In User Study 1, we tested the reliability, usability, and subjective workload of the use of the device. Participants (N = 29) with a normal sense of smell performed an automated threshold test 4 times. The results showed that the correlations between the tests were statistically significant, r = 0.44 to 0.78, all P-values ≤0.018. In User Study 2, we demonstrated the functioning of the device with normosmic and hyposmic/anosmic participants (n = 23 and n = 27, respectively) who performed both the current clinical standard, Sniffin' Sticks test, and the AutomOT test. Also, the usability and subjective workload of the use of the device were evaluated. The overall correlation of olfactory thresholds between the Sniffin' Sticks and the AutomOT was r = 0.48, P < 0.001. In both user studies, the results indicated good usability as measured by the System Usability Scale and low workload assessed by NASA Task Load Index. Overall, the results suggest that the newly developed AutomOT test is a reliable, valid, and usable tool for clinical assessment of olfactory thresholds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Senses
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjaf029
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A new method for automated olfactory threshold testing

Divesh Thaploo, Veikko Surakka, Jarmo Verho, Timo Salpavaara et al.
1 citations
Chemical Senses
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
1.46
article

A new method for automated olfactory threshold testing

Divesh Thaploo, Veikko Surakka, Jarmo Verho, Timo Salpavaara, Antti Vehkaoja, Philipp Müller, Oleg Špakov, Jussi Rantala, Jani Lylykangas, Pasi Kallio, Thomas R. Hummel, Marko Björkbacka, Venla Kamppari
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We present a new method for fully self-administered olfactory testing. Technical development and testing and 2 user studies were conducted to test the functionality of a prototype device called Automated Olfactory Threshold Test (AutomOT). Technical testing showed repeatable functioning of the developed olfactory display technology in accurately producing 11 predefined odor intensity levels over 10 different days. In User Study 1, we tested the reliability, usability, and subjective workload of the use of the device. Participants (N = 29) with a normal sense of smell performed an automated threshold test 4 times. The results showed that the correlations between the tests were statistically significant, r = 0.44 to 0.78, all P-values ≤0.018. In User Study 2, we demonstrated the functioning of the device with normosmic and hyposmic/anosmic participants (n = 23 and n = 27, respectively) who performed both the current clinical standard, Sniffin' Sticks test, and the AutomOT test. Also, the usability and subjective workload of the use of the device were evaluated. The overall correlation of olfactory thresholds between the Sniffin' Sticks and the AutomOT was r = 0.48, P < 0.001. In both user studies, the results indicated good usability as measured by the System Usability Scale and low workload assessed by NASA Task Load Index. Overall, the results suggest that the newly developed AutomOT test is a reliable, valid, and usable tool for clinical assessment of olfactory thresholds.

Chemical SensesVol. 50
Tampere University of Applied Sciences (FI), Taste and Smell Clinic (US), Tampere University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.