Validation of a Chinese version of the Nature Relatedness Scale (NRS-C)

This study aimed to validate the Chinese version of the Nature Relatedness Scale (NRSC). Building on previous studies that had completed the translation and back-translation of the original English scale, this study first evaluated item comprehensibility with two participants groups (N = 64, N = 40). A total of 692 university students from three Chinese universities were then recruited for further validation. Item analysis showed good discriminative ability, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) suggested removing items 4 and 13 to enhance applicability. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the three-factor structure of the NRSC, with the second-order model demonstrating a good fit after removing items 3 and 6 (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 2.508, NFI = 0.888, RFI = 0.863, IFI = 0.934, TLI = 0.918, CFI = 0.933, RMSEA = 0.061), indicating strong structural validity. The NRS-C showed a significant correlation with the Connectedness to Nature Scale (CNS) (r = 0.71), demonstrating high convergent validity. Internal consistency coefficients (NR-self: 0.88, NR-perspective: 0.75, NR-experience: 0.71, Total: 0.91) confirmed high reliability. These findings suggest that the NRSC, with 17 items across three dimensions, is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing nature relatedness among Chinese university students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105404
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of a Chinese version of the Nature Relatedness Scale (NRS-C)

Nor Shafrin Ahmad, Zhang Jian-xing, Y M Li, Lingping Zeng et al.
1 links
Acta Psychologica
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Validation of a Chinese version of the Nature Relatedness Scale (NRS-C)

Nor Shafrin Ahmad, Zhang Jian-xing, Y M Li, Lingping Zeng, Ying Yang, Chunrong Zuo, Zhiyong Li, Xiangnan Li, Xiaogang Zhou
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to validate the Chinese version of the Nature Relatedness Scale (NRSC). Building on previous studies that had completed the translation and back-translation of the original English scale, this study first evaluated item comprehensibility with two participants groups (N = 64, N = 40). A total of 692 university students from three Chinese universities were then recruited for further validation. Item analysis showed good discriminative ability, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) suggested removing items 4 and 13 to enhance applicability. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the three-factor structure of the NRSC, with the second-order model demonstrating a good fit after removing items 3 and 6 (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 2.508, NFI = 0.888, RFI = 0.863, IFI = 0.934, TLI = 0.918, CFI = 0.933, RMSEA = 0.061), indicating strong structural validity. The NRS-C showed a significant correlation with the Connectedness to Nature Scale (CNS) (r = 0.71), demonstrating high convergent validity. Internal consistency coefficients (NR-self: 0.88, NR-perspective: 0.75, NR-experience: 0.71, Total: 0.91) confirmed high reliability. These findings suggest that the NRSC, with 17 items across three dimensions, is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing nature relatedness among Chinese university students.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 259
Zhejiang Normal University (CN), Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), Tianjin University (CN), Shaoxing University (CN), Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Huainan Normal University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.