The National Health Service–Galleri multicancer screening trial: explanation and justification of unique and important design issues

Despite there being a plethora of multi-cancer early-detection tests, NHS-Galleri (ISRCTN91431511) is the only randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a multi-cancer liquid biopsy in a screening setting thus far. The NHS-Galleri trial has generated much debate, and it has been criticized in the medical press. Some of these criticisms stem from differing opinions over the choice of primary endpoint, others from poor reporting in statements to journalists from those not directly involved in the trial. Some of the debate is positive, and relates to the speed of enrolment, and the equity in participation, which have shown what is possible in large population-based RCTs. Here we explain our reasoning for undertaking the trial and designing it in the way we did. We focus on the reason to consider multi-cancer screening and why we felt that the results from non-randomized clinical studies of GRAIL's Galleri test justified a large RCT. We also consider the very slow progress in adopting effective cancer screening historically and in reducing cancer mortality through early detection. There is a need to plan now for future research and implementation depending on the results of the trial. NHS-Galleri is the first double-blind cancer screening RCT. It also, unusually, uses late-stage cancer incidence (rather than cancer mortality) as its primary outcome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf218
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The National Health Service–Galleri multicancer screening trial: explanation and justification of unique and important design issues

Charles Swanton, Peter David Sasieni, Richard D Neal
3 citations
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
2.81
article

The National Health Service–Galleri multicancer screening trial: explanation and justification of unique and important design issues

Charles Swanton, Peter David Sasieni, Richard D Neal
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Despite there being a plethora of multi-cancer early-detection tests, NHS-Galleri (ISRCTN91431511) is the only randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a multi-cancer liquid biopsy in a screening setting thus far. The NHS-Galleri trial has generated much debate, and it has been criticized in the medical press. Some of these criticisms stem from differing opinions over the choice of primary endpoint, others from poor reporting in statements to journalists from those not directly involved in the trial. Some of the debate is positive, and relates to the speed of enrolment, and the equity in participation, which have shown what is possible in large population-based RCTs. Here we explain our reasoning for undertaking the trial and designing it in the way we did. We focus on the reason to consider multi-cancer screening and why we felt that the results from non-randomized clinical studies of GRAIL's Galleri test justified a large RCT. We also consider the very slow progress in adopting effective cancer screening historically and in reducing cancer mortality through early detection. There is a need to plan now for future research and implementation depending on the results of the trial. NHS-Galleri is the first double-blind cancer screening RCT. It also, unusually, uses late-stage cancer incidence (rather than cancer mortality) as its primary outcome.

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Exeter (GB), The Francis Crick Institute (GB), Cancer Research UK (GB), London Cancer (GB), CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence (GB), University College London (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
2.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.