The impacts of removing pharmaceutical co-payments for chronic conditions at primary care level: a pilot study in rural China

The underutilization of primary care (PC) presents a substantial challenge in enhancing the people-centeredness, quality, and efficiency of health services for patients with chronic diseases. Pharmaceutical copayments have been considered a key barrier to patient access in low- and middle-income countries. It is unclear whether the removal of pharmaceutical copayment can lead to better care and management of chronic diseases. This study sought to evaluate the impact on healthcare utilization and spending of a policy that waived fees for essential pharmaceuticals at PC facilities, piloted county-wide from 2014 in rural China. Using individual claims data from 2010 to 2017, we applied a synthetic difference-in-difference approach to estimate the policy's effects. Our sample included 9115 patients with hypertension and/or diabetes from the pilot county and 30 675 patients from the other counties in the same municipality. The policy led to a significant increase of 0.69 in the number of PC visits per patient per year (95% CI: 0.46-0.91), equivalent to a rise of 44.1%. Annual spending per person on outpatients at PC facilities increased significantly due to the policy, by 58 yuan (95% CI: 36-80), equivalent to a rise of 40.5%. As for outpatient visits at hospitals, there was a 25.8% significant reduction in the number of visits per year (-0.56; 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.16) and a nonsignificant increase in spending (45 yuan; 95% CI: -111 to 21). The annual number of admissions and spending on inpatients per person in all facilities remained stable. Using claims data, we have demonstrated that targeted removal of copayment for essential medicines successfully shifted outpatient visits and expenditure from hospitals to PC facilities but did not affect hospitalization and inpatient expenditure. Further research may be attempted to see if removing pharmaceutical copayments on people with less severe NCDs could reduce hospitalizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Policy and Planning
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaf043
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impacts of removing pharmaceutical co-payments for chronic conditions at primary care level: a pilot study in rural China

Anne Mills, Timothy Powell‐Jackson, Qianchen Wei, Pingnian He et al.
Health Policy and Planning
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
article

The impacts of removing pharmaceutical co-payments for chronic conditions at primary care level: a pilot study in rural China

Anne Mills, Timothy Powell‐Jackson, Qianchen Wei, Pingnian He, Jin Xu, Beibei Yuan, Qingyue Meng, Hanyi Xu, W.Y. Lu
article en

Abstract

The underutilization of primary care (PC) presents a substantial challenge in enhancing the people-centeredness, quality, and efficiency of health services for patients with chronic diseases. Pharmaceutical copayments have been considered a key barrier to patient access in low- and middle-income countries. It is unclear whether the removal of pharmaceutical copayment can lead to better care and management of chronic diseases. This study sought to evaluate the impact on healthcare utilization and spending of a policy that waived fees for essential pharmaceuticals at PC facilities, piloted county-wide from 2014 in rural China. Using individual claims data from 2010 to 2017, we applied a synthetic difference-in-difference approach to estimate the policy's effects. Our sample included 9115 patients with hypertension and/or diabetes from the pilot county and 30 675 patients from the other counties in the same municipality. The policy led to a significant increase of 0.69 in the number of PC visits per patient per year (95% CI: 0.46-0.91), equivalent to a rise of 44.1%. Annual spending per person on outpatients at PC facilities increased significantly due to the policy, by 58 yuan (95% CI: 36-80), equivalent to a rise of 40.5%. As for outpatient visits at hospitals, there was a 25.8% significant reduction in the number of visits per year (-0.56; 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.16) and a nonsignificant increase in spending (45 yuan; 95% CI: -111 to 21). The annual number of admissions and spending on inpatients per person in all facilities remained stable. Using claims data, we have demonstrated that targeted removal of copayment for essential medicines successfully shifted outpatient visits and expenditure from hospitals to PC facilities but did not affect hospitalization and inpatient expenditure. Further research may be attempted to see if removing pharmaceutical copayments on people with less severe NCDs could reduce hospitalizations.

Health Policy and PlanningVol. 40(8)
University of London (GB), Hainan Normal University (CN), Peking University (CN), Hainan Maternal and Child Health Hospital (CN), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.