Climate effects of a future net forestation scenario in CMIP6 models

Abstract Forestation may reduce temperatures by lowering atmospheric CO 2 . However, biogeophysical changes from forestation may weaken this cooling. We use twelve Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) models to quantify the biogeochemical (carbon cycle) and biogeophysical (non-carbon cycle) effects of net forestation, as quantified as the difference between the end of two future scenarios: ssp370-ssp126Lu and ssp370. Biogeochemical effects have an inferred global multi-model mean cooling (−0.08 ± 0.02 K). Changes in fires have no significant effect on land carbon storage globally. In contrast with studies indicating biogeophysical impacts counteract biogeochemical impacts by up to 50%, we find that biogeophysical effects lead to insignificant global mean cooling (−0.002 ± 0.041 K). Tropical land shows cooling (−0.058 ± 0.058 K) with eight of twelve models indicating cooling, consistent with prior studies. Using the Surface Energy Balance Decomposition, we find cooling is primarily from increased evapotranspiration and decreased downwelling solar radiation related to clouds and aerosols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-01127-4
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate effects of a future net forestation scenario in CMIP6 models

Olivia E. Clifton, Rosie A. Fisher, Bryan K. Mignone, James L. Gomez et al.
2 citations
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
2.21
article

Climate effects of a future net forestation scenario in CMIP6 models

Olivia E. Clifton, Rosie A. Fisher, Bryan K. Mignone, James L. Gomez, Sergey Malyshev, Steven T. Turnock, Larry W. Horowitz, Elena Shevliakova, Robert J. Allen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Forestation may reduce temperatures by lowering atmospheric CO 2 . However, biogeophysical changes from forestation may weaken this cooling. We use twelve Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) models to quantify the biogeochemical (carbon cycle) and biogeophysical (non-carbon cycle) effects of net forestation, as quantified as the difference between the end of two future scenarios: ssp370-ssp126Lu and ssp370. Biogeochemical effects have an inferred global multi-model mean cooling (−0.08 ± 0.02 K). Changes in fires have no significant effect on land carbon storage globally. In contrast with studies indicating biogeophysical impacts counteract biogeochemical impacts by up to 50%, we find that biogeophysical effects lead to insignificant global mean cooling (−0.002 ± 0.041 K). Tropical land shows cooling (−0.058 ± 0.058 K) with eight of twelve models indicating cooling, consistent with prior studies. Using the Surface Energy Balance Decomposition, we find cooling is primarily from increased evapotranspiration and decreased downwelling solar radiation related to clouds and aerosols.

npj Climate and Atmospheric ScienceVol. 8(1)
University of California, Riverside (US), Met Office (GB), NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (US), CICERO Center for International Climate Research (NO), ExxonMobil (United States) (US)
ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company, Horizon 2020
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.