Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bacteria Isolated from Diabetic Foot Infections in Dhamar Governorate, Yemen

Background: Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are a major complication of diabetes, particularly in resource-limited settings like Yemen, where antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and fragmented healthcare exacerbate outcomes. Dhamar Governorate faces unique challenges, including limited diagnostics, inappropriate antibiotic use, and sparse local data on DFI etiology and resistance patterns, necessitating context-specific insights. Aim: This study aimed to identify predominant bacterial pathogens in DFIs, characterize their antibiotic susceptibility, and evaluate sociodemographic and clinical risk factors to inform tailored management in Dhamar, Yemen. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at two hospitals in Dhamar (April–November 2021). Thirty hospitalized DFI patients were enrolled. Wound samples were collected via swab/aspiration, cultured, and tested for antibiotic susceptibility using disc diffusion (EUCAST guidelines). Sociodemographic, clinical, and microbiological data were analyzed using SPSS. Results: Bacterial infections were detected in 70% (21/30) of patients, predominantly Gram-positive organisms (85.7%). Key risk factors included illiteracy (infected: 84.2% vs. non-infected: 45.5%, p=0.042), urban residence (100% vs. 59.1% rural, p=0.067), and amputation (100% infected vs. 60.9% non-amputated, p=0.048). Type-II diabetes showed borderline association with infection (83.3% vs. 50.0% Type-I, p=0.051). Alarmingly, 100% resistance to amoxicillin and 90.5% to cefuroxime were observed. Vancomycin (94.4% sensitivity in Gram-positive isolates) and amikacin (100% sensitivity in Gram-negative isolates) were most effective. Conclusion: The high prevalence of DFIs and widespread AMR in Dhamar underscore urgent needs for improved antibiotic stewardship and localized guidelines. Empiric use of vancomycin (Gram-positive coverage) and amikacin (Gram-negative) may be warranted, but susceptibility testing remains critical. Addressing socioeconomic risk factors, such as patient education and glycemic control, is essential to reduce DFI morbidity. This study highlights the imperative for enhanced AMR surveillance in low-resource settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Medicine & Health
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53460/amh72.2025.007
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bacteria Isolated from Diabetic Foot Infections in Dhamar Governorate, Yemen

Eftekhar Al-Ghassani
Annals of Medicine & Health
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
article

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bacteria Isolated from Diabetic Foot Infections in Dhamar Governorate, Yemen

Eftekhar Al-Ghassani
article en

Abstract

Background: Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are a major complication of diabetes, particularly in resource-limited settings like Yemen, where antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and fragmented healthcare exacerbate outcomes. Dhamar Governorate faces unique challenges, including limited diagnostics, inappropriate antibiotic use, and sparse local data on DFI etiology and resistance patterns, necessitating context-specific insights. Aim: This study aimed to identify predominant bacterial pathogens in DFIs, characterize their antibiotic susceptibility, and evaluate sociodemographic and clinical risk factors to inform tailored management in Dhamar, Yemen. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at two hospitals in Dhamar (April–November 2021). Thirty hospitalized DFI patients were enrolled. Wound samples were collected via swab/aspiration, cultured, and tested for antibiotic susceptibility using disc diffusion (EUCAST guidelines). Sociodemographic, clinical, and microbiological data were analyzed using SPSS. Results: Bacterial infections were detected in 70% (21/30) of patients, predominantly Gram-positive organisms (85.7%). Key risk factors included illiteracy (infected: 84.2% vs. non-infected: 45.5%, p=0.042), urban residence (100% vs. 59.1% rural, p=0.067), and amputation (100% infected vs. 60.9% non-amputated, p=0.048). Type-II diabetes showed borderline association with infection (83.3% vs. 50.0% Type-I, p=0.051). Alarmingly, 100% resistance to amoxicillin and 90.5% to cefuroxime were observed. Vancomycin (94.4% sensitivity in Gram-positive isolates) and amikacin (100% sensitivity in Gram-negative isolates) were most effective. Conclusion: The high prevalence of DFIs and widespread AMR in Dhamar underscore urgent needs for improved antibiotic stewardship and localized guidelines. Empiric use of vancomycin (Gram-positive coverage) and amikacin (Gram-negative) may be warranted, but susceptibility testing remains critical. Addressing socioeconomic risk factors, such as patient education and glycemic control, is essential to reduce DFI morbidity. This study highlights the imperative for enhanced AMR surveillance in low-resource settings.

Annals of Medicine & Health
Thamar University (YE)
Thamar University
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.