Differences in Olfactory Discrimination, but Not Sensitivity, Between African Savanna and Asian Elephants

While African savanna and Asian elephants split between 4.2 and 9 MYA, they are often regarded as one united group, 'elephants.' This is surprising because, while both are keystone species in their respective habitats, each faces different environmental pressures and has rarely been compared experimentally. In general, African savanna elephants must locate resources that vary spatially and temporally across patchy savannas, while Asian elephants do so within dense, high-biodiversity forests. Both species use olfaction to guide decision-making; however, considering their ecologies, we hypothesize that their olfactory abilities differ. Thus, we investigated the sensitivity limits and discrimination abilities of both savanna and Asian elephants' olfactory systems, and changes in these limits in a complex odor environment. We employed two odor-based choice experiments, using <i>c</i> <i>is-3-Hexenyl acetate</i>-a common green leaf volatile that is emitted by plants globally-as a target odor. While both species correctly detected a target odor, albeit at different concentrations-savanna elephants detected it at 50 parts per million (ppm) and Asian elephants at 100 ppm-only the savanna elephants' limit changed (to 1000 ppm) in the complex odor environment. While we were limited by a small sample size (i.e., <i>n</i> = 5 for each species), our data suggest that there may be differences in the olfactory abilities of these two elephant species.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71896
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in Olfactory Discrimination, but Not Sensitivity, Between African Savanna and Asian Elephants

Melissa H. Schmitt, Sarah L. Jacobson, Joshua M. Plotnik, Matthew S. Rudolph
3 citations
Ecology and Evolution
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
4.39
article

Differences in Olfactory Discrimination, but Not Sensitivity, Between African Savanna and Asian Elephants

Melissa H. Schmitt, Sarah L. Jacobson, Joshua M. Plotnik, Matthew S. Rudolph
article en
3 citations

Abstract

While African savanna and Asian elephants split between 4.2 and 9 MYA, they are often regarded as one united group, 'elephants.' This is surprising because, while both are keystone species in their respective habitats, each faces different environmental pressures and has rarely been compared experimentally. In general, African savanna elephants must locate resources that vary spatially and temporally across patchy savannas, while Asian elephants do so within dense, high-biodiversity forests. Both species use olfaction to guide decision-making; however, considering their ecologies, we hypothesize that their olfactory abilities differ. Thus, we investigated the sensitivity limits and discrimination abilities of both savanna and Asian elephants' olfactory systems, and changes in these limits in a complex odor environment. We employed two odor-based choice experiments, using <i>c</i> <i>is-3-Hexenyl acetate</i>-a common green leaf volatile that is emitted by plants globally-as a target odor. While both species correctly detected a target odor, albeit at different concentrations-savanna elephants detected it at 50 parts per million (ppm) and Asian elephants at 100 ppm-only the savanna elephants' limit changed (to 1000 ppm) in the complex odor environment. While we were limited by a small sample size (i.e., <i>n</i> = 5 for each species), our data suggest that there may be differences in the olfactory abilities of these two elephant species.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 15(8)
The Graduate Center, CUNY (US), City University of New York (US), University of North Dakota (US), University of Mpumalanga (ZA), Hunter College (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
4.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.