Capturing pregnancy recognition trajectories: a critical reflection of new quantitative measures tested in Ethiopia, Malawi, Nigeria and Zambia

The experiences and timings of pregnancy recognition trajectories have significant impacts on pregnancy-related care. Understanding individuals' contextually informed trajectories is crucial to their reproductive rights and service delivery needs. While many studies take pregnancy recognition as a starting point, capturing the complexities and nuances of these trajectories has received much less attention. This paper critically reflects on new approaches to capturing pregnancy recognition trajectories in two studies conducted between 2018 and 19, one in Nigeria with women aged 18 and over (<i>n</i> = 394), and a three-country study with adolescents aged 10-19 in Ethiopia, Malawi, and Zambia (<i>n</i> = 313). Pregnancy recognition trajectories were complex and involved multiple physical, material, and psychological recognition factors. Adolescents in the three-country study cited predominantly between two and four factors that led to their pregnancy recognition, with a range of one to seven factors. In the Nigerian study, 43.4% of respondents named two factors that led them to recognise they were pregnant, with a range of one to five factors. As pregnancy recognition is the starting point for many public health actions and interventions, it is imperative that future survey tools better capture this complex and poorly understood process. Our analyses suggest that questions should include response categories that capture physical, material, and psychological contributors to pregnancy recognition, including open-ended responses to capture heretofore unidentified aspects of this process. Questions on the duration of time between recognition factors would be beneficial, as well as an understanding of what factors were most important to an individual when recognising a pregnancy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2025.2531684
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capturing pregnancy recognition trajectories: a critical reflection of new quantitative measures tested in Ethiopia, Malawi, Nigeria and Zambia

Onikepe Owolabi, Ernestina Coast, Ann M. Moore, Tamara Fetters et al.
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters
Global Maternal and Child Health
article

Capturing pregnancy recognition trajectories: a critical reflection of new quantitative measures tested in Ethiopia, Malawi, Nigeria and Zambia

Onikepe Owolabi, Ernestina Coast, Ann M. Moore, Tamara Fetters, Joe Strong
article en

Abstract

The experiences and timings of pregnancy recognition trajectories have significant impacts on pregnancy-related care. Understanding individuals' contextually informed trajectories is crucial to their reproductive rights and service delivery needs. While many studies take pregnancy recognition as a starting point, capturing the complexities and nuances of these trajectories has received much less attention. This paper critically reflects on new approaches to capturing pregnancy recognition trajectories in two studies conducted between 2018 and 19, one in Nigeria with women aged 18 and over (<i>n</i> = 394), and a three-country study with adolescents aged 10-19 in Ethiopia, Malawi, and Zambia (<i>n</i> = 313). Pregnancy recognition trajectories were complex and involved multiple physical, material, and psychological recognition factors. Adolescents in the three-country study cited predominantly between two and four factors that led to their pregnancy recognition, with a range of one to seven factors. In the Nigerian study, 43.4% of respondents named two factors that led them to recognise they were pregnant, with a range of one to five factors. As pregnancy recognition is the starting point for many public health actions and interventions, it is imperative that future survey tools better capture this complex and poorly understood process. Our analyses suggest that questions should include response categories that capture physical, material, and psychological contributors to pregnancy recognition, including open-ended responses to capture heretofore unidentified aspects of this process. Questions on the duration of time between recognition factors would be beneficial, as well as an understanding of what factors were most important to an individual when recognising a pregnancy.

Sexual and Reproductive Health MattersVol. 33(1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Guttmacher Institute (US), Department for International Development (GB), London International Development Centre (GB), Applied Physical Sciences (United States) (US), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Global Maternal and Child Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.