Blood flow restriction exercise in high-performance sport settings: A practitioner survey

The purpose of this study was to characterise how blood flow restriction (BFR) exercise is utilised by practitioners in high-performance sports settings. Participants (<i>n</i> = 154) engaged with the questionnaire, of which 123 provided data about their use of BFR with athletes in high-performance sports settings. The main findings indicated that BFR was primarily used for injury rehabilitation (81.3% of practitioners) or supplementary to traditional strength and conditioning programs for muscle hypertrophy (80.4%), limiting loss of muscle mass (71.9%), or muscle strengthening (51.6%). Participants used BFR with both team and individual sports, but with only a small subset of the athletes they worked with (65% of practitioners used BFR with less than 25% of their athletes). Cuff pressures were prescribed using both measured individualised occlusion pressures (56.1%) and arbitrary set pressures (52.8%). Despite practitioners' awareness of contraindications and the need for screening, formal screening tools were underutilised (55.7% of practitioners did not use a screening tool for clearance to use BFR). Ultimately, BFR exercise was largely prescribed in line with established guidelines, although the application of individualised cuff pressures and health screening processes may require further attention from practitioners in high-performance sports.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2525710
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.14

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blood flow restriction exercise in high-performance sport settings: A practitioner survey

Stephen D. Patterson, Stuart A. Warmington, Brendan R. Scott, Matthew J. Clarkson
3 citations
Journal of Sports Sciences
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
7.14
article

Blood flow restriction exercise in high-performance sport settings: A practitioner survey

Stephen D. Patterson, Stuart A. Warmington, Brendan R. Scott, Matthew J. Clarkson
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to characterise how blood flow restriction (BFR) exercise is utilised by practitioners in high-performance sports settings. Participants (<i>n</i> = 154) engaged with the questionnaire, of which 123 provided data about their use of BFR with athletes in high-performance sports settings. The main findings indicated that BFR was primarily used for injury rehabilitation (81.3% of practitioners) or supplementary to traditional strength and conditioning programs for muscle hypertrophy (80.4%), limiting loss of muscle mass (71.9%), or muscle strengthening (51.6%). Participants used BFR with both team and individual sports, but with only a small subset of the athletes they worked with (65% of practitioners used BFR with less than 25% of their athletes). Cuff pressures were prescribed using both measured individualised occlusion pressures (56.1%) and arbitrary set pressures (52.8%). Despite practitioners' awareness of contraindications and the need for screening, formal screening tools were underutilised (55.7% of practitioners did not use a screening tool for clearance to use BFR). Ultimately, BFR exercise was largely prescribed in line with established guidelines, although the application of individualised cuff pressures and health screening processes may require further attention from practitioners in high-performance sports.

Journal of Sports SciencesVol. 43(19)
Deakin University (AU), Murdoch University (AU), St Mary's University Twickenham London (GB), Victoria School of Management (CH), Victoria University (AU)
Victoria University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
7.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.