Biochar in the circular bionutrient economy

The circular bionutrient economy is defined here as the circular economy of nutrients in managed organic residues. Here, we posit that biochar technology can stimulate the circular bionutrient economy by meeting the following three requirements: 1) nutrients are captured in a dry form, increasing market value and lowering transportation cost; 2) individual nutrients can be captured separately and combined as needed for particular plants and soils; 3) all pathogens and most pollutants can be removed with the notable exception of heavy metals. Pyrolysis and associated moisture removal enabled by the energy released during pyrolysis decreases weight of solid excreta by 85 to 90% and volume by 74 to 90%. This will lower storage and transport costs allowing redistribution of nutrients from production to processing and consumption of food. Incorporating liquid organic residues into nutrient recovery processes is crucial to the circular bionutrient economy. For example, N fertilizer from human feces would only generate about 2% (2.0 to 2.4 Tg N y<sup>-1</sup>) of current global N application, whereas including urine could increase this fraction to 16 to 17% (15.7 to 16.9 Tg N y<sup>-1</sup>). Nutrient acquisition by plants can be increased by biochar through nutrient retention and pH buffering in soil. We posit that leveraging biochar to close the nutrient circle requires public-private partnerships in forms of a community of practice and green alliances. These must develop a marketable product that incentivizes private investment. Such products may only be cost competitive with established fertilizer products by internalizing external environmental costs possibly through market mechanisms including but not limited to carbon credits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2503668122
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Phosphorus and nutrient management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biochar in the circular bionutrient economy

Rebecca Nelson, Johan Six, Johannes Lehmann, Edmundo Barrios et al.
7 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Phosphorus and nutrient management
6.98
article

Biochar in the circular bionutrient economy

Rebecca Nelson, Johan Six, Johannes Lehmann, Edmundo Barrios, Lucinda Li, John T. Trimmer, Mariana Devault
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The circular bionutrient economy is defined here as the circular economy of nutrients in managed organic residues. Here, we posit that biochar technology can stimulate the circular bionutrient economy by meeting the following three requirements: 1) nutrients are captured in a dry form, increasing market value and lowering transportation cost; 2) individual nutrients can be captured separately and combined as needed for particular plants and soils; 3) all pathogens and most pollutants can be removed with the notable exception of heavy metals. Pyrolysis and associated moisture removal enabled by the energy released during pyrolysis decreases weight of solid excreta by 85 to 90% and volume by 74 to 90%. This will lower storage and transport costs allowing redistribution of nutrients from production to processing and consumption of food. Incorporating liquid organic residues into nutrient recovery processes is crucial to the circular bionutrient economy. For example, N fertilizer from human feces would only generate about 2% (2.0 to 2.4 Tg N y<sup>-1</sup>) of current global N application, whereas including urine could increase this fraction to 16 to 17% (15.7 to 16.9 Tg N y<sup>-1</sup>). Nutrient acquisition by plants can be increased by biochar through nutrient retention and pH buffering in soil. We posit that leveraging biochar to close the nutrient circle requires public-private partnerships in forms of a community of practice and green alliances. These must develop a marketable product that incentivizes private investment. Such products may only be cost competitive with established fertilizer products by internalizing external environmental costs possibly through market mechanisms including but not limited to carbon credits.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(33)
Atkins (United States) (US), Center for Global Development (US), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT), Cornell University (US), ETH Zurich (CH), Research International (United States) (US), Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Malo (FR), SystemsX.ch (CH), Syracuse University (US)
New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Phosphorus and nutrient management
6.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.