Balancing public health and individual autonomy: a study of China’s vaccination policy

The article examines China's vaccination policy, focusing particularly on childhood immunisation and pandemic vaccines. Although China's laws require individuals to engage in the vaccination decision-making process, the policy does not enforce mandatory vaccination through penalties. Instead, it emphasises informed decision-making, allowing and supporting individuals to choose whether to vaccinate or adopt other preventive measures based on their best health interests. The legal framework includes obligations for guardians to make vaccination decisions for their children, with mechanisms to encourage compliance through checking vaccination status and guiding guardians to vaccination services, rather than punishing vaccine refusal. This approach aligns with the Siracusa Principles, advocating the least restrictive measures necessary to protect public health. The article concludes that China's vaccination policy is best understood as 'mandatory decision-making', a system that balances public health objectives with individual autonomy by making the decision-making process mandatory while keeping the actual vaccination decision voluntary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Ethics
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2025-110762
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing public health and individual autonomy: a study of China’s vaccination policy

Jichao Wang, Xiaomei Zhai
Journal of Medical Ethics
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Balancing public health and individual autonomy: a study of China’s vaccination policy

Jichao Wang, Xiaomei Zhai
article en

Abstract

The article examines China's vaccination policy, focusing particularly on childhood immunisation and pandemic vaccines. Although China's laws require individuals to engage in the vaccination decision-making process, the policy does not enforce mandatory vaccination through penalties. Instead, it emphasises informed decision-making, allowing and supporting individuals to choose whether to vaccinate or adopt other preventive measures based on their best health interests. The legal framework includes obligations for guardians to make vaccination decisions for their children, with mechanisms to encourage compliance through checking vaccination status and guiding guardians to vaccination services, rather than punishing vaccine refusal. This approach aligns with the Siracusa Principles, advocating the least restrictive measures necessary to protect public health. The article concludes that China's vaccination policy is best understood as 'mandatory decision-making', a system that balances public health objectives with individual autonomy by making the decision-making process mandatory while keeping the actual vaccination decision voluntary.

Journal of Medical Ethics
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.