The 2025 M <sub>w</sub> 7.7 Mandalay, Myanmar, earthquake reveals a complex earthquake cycle with clustering and variable segmentation on the Sagaing Fault

We use remote sensing observations to document surface deformation caused by the 2025 M<sub>w</sub>7.7 Mandalay earthquake. This event is a unique case of an extremely long (~510 km) and sustained supershear rupture probably favored by the rather smooth and continuous geometry of this section of the structurally mature Sagaing Fault. The seismic rupture involved the locked portion of the fault over its entire depth extent (0 to 13 km) with a remarkably uniform slip distribution that averages 3.3 m, and an average stress drop of 4.7 MPa. No shallow-slip deficit is observed. The rupture extent challenges usual scaling laws relating earthquake magnitude, fault length, and slip. The fault ruptured along a known seismic gap that last ruptured in 1839 and tailed off into sections that ruptured during large earthquakes in 1930 and 1946. The amplitude and spatial distribution of fault slip in the 2025 event conform only approximatively to the slip-predictable model and the segmentation inferred from the fault geometry and past ruptures. Plausible sequences of earthquakes with variable magnitude, segmentation, and return periods, including events similar to the 2025 earthquake are produced in quasidynamic simulations using a simplified but nonplanar fault geometry. Based on this simulation, M<sub>w</sub>>7.5 events return irregularly with an interevent time of ~141 y on average and a SD of ~40 y. The simulation is consistent with the historical seismicity and with the maximum magnitude ~M<sub>w</sub>7.9 and return period (~250 y) derived from moment conservation. Data assimilation into such simulations could provide a way for time-dependent hazard assessment in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2514378122
Citations
20
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
37.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The 2025 M w 7.7 Mandalay, Myanmar, earthquake reveals a complex earthquake cycle with clustering and variable segmentation on the Sagaing Fault

Chris Milliner, Kyungjae Im, Kejie Chen, Solene L. Antoine et al.
20 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
earthquake and tectonic studies
37.33
article

The 2025 M w 7.7 Mandalay, Myanmar, earthquake reveals a complex earthquake cycle with clustering and variable segmentation on the Sagaing Fault

Chris Milliner, Kyungjae Im, Kejie Chen, Solene L. Antoine, Jean‐Philippe Avouac, Kang Wang, Chris Rollins, Rajani Shrestha
article en
20 citations

Abstract

We use remote sensing observations to document surface deformation caused by the 2025 M<sub>w</sub>7.7 Mandalay earthquake. This event is a unique case of an extremely long (~510 km) and sustained supershear rupture probably favored by the rather smooth and continuous geometry of this section of the structurally mature Sagaing Fault. The seismic rupture involved the locked portion of the fault over its entire depth extent (0 to 13 km) with a remarkably uniform slip distribution that averages 3.3 m, and an average stress drop of 4.7 MPa. No shallow-slip deficit is observed. The rupture extent challenges usual scaling laws relating earthquake magnitude, fault length, and slip. The fault ruptured along a known seismic gap that last ruptured in 1839 and tailed off into sections that ruptured during large earthquakes in 1930 and 1946. The amplitude and spatial distribution of fault slip in the 2025 event conform only approximatively to the slip-predictable model and the segmentation inferred from the fault geometry and past ruptures. Plausible sequences of earthquakes with variable magnitude, segmentation, and return periods, including events similar to the 2025 earthquake are produced in quasidynamic simulations using a simplified but nonplanar fault geometry. Based on this simulation, M<sub>w</sub>>7.5 events return irregularly with an interevent time of ~141 y on average and a SD of ~40 y. The simulation is consistent with the historical seismicity and with the maximum magnitude ~M<sub>w</sub>7.9 and return period (~250 y) derived from moment conservation. Data assimilation into such simulations could provide a way for time-dependent hazard assessment in the future.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(33)
GNS Science (NZ), California Institute of Technology (US), Planetary Science Institute (US), Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (US), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), Hutt Hospital (NZ), Department of Earth Sciences (RU)
National Science Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Southern California Earthquake Center, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, U.S. Geological Survey
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
earthquake and tectonic studies
37.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.