Validation of nine prognostic models in patients with bone metastases undergoing surgery

Our study suggests particularly helpful predictive performance of the models by Sorensen et al. and Janssen et al. in both patients with extremity metastases and patients with spine metastases undergoing surgery. Given that we only included patients undergoing surgery, additional validation studies in conservatively treated patients are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-06147-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Management of metastatic bone disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of nine prognostic models in patients with bone metastases undergoing surgery

Maria Anna Smolle, Peter Ferlic, Lukas Leitner, Florian A. Wenzl et al.
1 citations
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Management of metastatic bone disease
2.01
article

Validation of nine prognostic models in patients with bone metastases undergoing surgery

Maria Anna Smolle, Peter Ferlic, Lukas Leitner, Florian A. Wenzl, Susanne Scheipl, Patrick Reinbacher, Andreas Leithner, P J Elmer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Our study suggests particularly helpful predictive performance of the models by Sorensen et al. and Janssen et al. in both patients with extremity metastases and patients with spine metastases undergoing surgery. Given that we only included patients undergoing surgery, additional validation studies in conservatively treated patients are warranted.

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and ResearchVol. 20(1)
National Health Service (GB), University of Leicester (GB), Medical University of Graz (AT), University of Zurich (CH), Karolinska Institutet (SE), LMU Klinikum (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Management of metastatic bone disease
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.