Virtual and In-Person Interview Offerings in the General Surgery Residency Application Cycle: A How-to Hybrid

PurposeVirtual General Surgery residency interviews remain common despite the easing of travel restrictions and health risks associated with the spread of COVID-19. The primary benefits of virtual interviews include time and cost savings for applicants and programs alike. Despite these benefits, many have advocated for a return to the in-person setting, citing improved ability for applicants to assess the intangibles of a program. In the 2022-2024 application cycles, our institution offered general surgery applicants the choice to interview virtually or in-person.MethodsApplicants who received an interview invitation for a categorical general surgery residency position at our institution could schedule either an in-person or virtual interview. Four in-person interview dates and 4 virtual interview dates were offered and filled. Applicants were ranked daily, compared only to those interviewed in the same modality. Conglomerate scores were then used to generate the overall rank list.ResultsInterviews were filled in a first-come first-serve manner with 55% of interview slots offered being in-person. A comparison of top-ranked and bottom-ranked individuals over 2 years demonstrates a near even split of their interviewing modality (60% of top-ranked candidates interviewed in person while 46.7% of bottom-ranked candidates interviewed in person, in the past 2 years). Matched candidates were also from both interview modalities (62% in-person).ConclusionWe describe the successful implementation of a hybrid interview system that allowed applicants to choose their interview modality. Prior data has demonstrated that when afforded the choice, most applicants elect to complete at least one interview in person and attend in-person post-interview events. This preference should not be ignored. Our study demonstrates that an individualized interview process can be offered with a successful Match of candidates from both interview types, allowing candidates the power and choice of their desired modality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Surgeon
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251367047
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Virtual and In-Person Interview Offerings in the General Surgery Residency Application Cycle: A How-to Hybrid

Maren Downing, Kristen M. Quinn, Louis T Runge, Jared White et al.
1 links
The American Surgeon
Diversity and Career in Medicine
article

Virtual and In-Person Interview Offerings in the General Surgery Residency Application Cycle: A How-to Hybrid

Maren Downing, Kristen M. Quinn, Louis T Runge, Jared White, Christian J. Streck, Colleen A. Donahue
article en

Abstract

PurposeVirtual General Surgery residency interviews remain common despite the easing of travel restrictions and health risks associated with the spread of COVID-19. The primary benefits of virtual interviews include time and cost savings for applicants and programs alike. Despite these benefits, many have advocated for a return to the in-person setting, citing improved ability for applicants to assess the intangibles of a program. In the 2022-2024 application cycles, our institution offered general surgery applicants the choice to interview virtually or in-person.MethodsApplicants who received an interview invitation for a categorical general surgery residency position at our institution could schedule either an in-person or virtual interview. Four in-person interview dates and 4 virtual interview dates were offered and filled. Applicants were ranked daily, compared only to those interviewed in the same modality. Conglomerate scores were then used to generate the overall rank list.ResultsInterviews were filled in a first-come first-serve manner with 55% of interview slots offered being in-person. A comparison of top-ranked and bottom-ranked individuals over 2 years demonstrates a near even split of their interviewing modality (60% of top-ranked candidates interviewed in person while 46.7% of bottom-ranked candidates interviewed in person, in the past 2 years). Matched candidates were also from both interview modalities (62% in-person).ConclusionWe describe the successful implementation of a hybrid interview system that allowed applicants to choose their interview modality. Prior data has demonstrated that when afforded the choice, most applicants elect to complete at least one interview in person and attend in-person post-interview events. This preference should not be ignored. Our study demonstrates that an individualized interview process can be offered with a successful Match of candidates from both interview types, allowing candidates the power and choice of their desired modality.

The American SurgeonVol. 92(2)
Campbell University (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.