Comparison of trastuzumab deruxtecan and sacituzumab govitecan in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a large real-world data analysis

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) are antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) increasingly used in HER2-negative breast cancer. We hypothesized that treatment benefit would vary across HER2-null, HER2-ultra-low, and HER2-low subgroups of HER2-negative breast cancer patients. We also aimed to study the clinical impact of different sequencing of the two ADCs. We analyzed a large, real-world cohort of 4,030 HER2-negative breast cancer specimens from patients treated with T-DXd or SG. Tumors underwent molecular profiling including HER2 status (IHC, CISH) and hormone receptor (HR) status (IHC) at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ, USA). Real-world clinical data were obtained from insurance claims and analyzed by Cox proportional hazards. HER2-low, HER2-ultra-low, and HER2-null cohorts treated with T-DXd had decreasing time-on-treatment (TOT; 4.8, 4.1, and 3.5 mo., respectively, P < 0.001), while HER2 status had little impact on SG TOT (3.0, 2.8, and 3.4 mo., respectively). Patients with HR+/HER2-negative tumors showed longer TOT when treated with T-DXd only (n = 1,049) than with SG-only (n = 453), even in the HER2-null subset (P < 0.001). In all HER2-negative patients treated with both ADCs, T-DXd-first (n = 547) or SG-first (n = 432) showed no cumulative TOT difference (10.4 vs. 10.8 mo., P = 0.356); however, the HER2-null subset showed preference for SG-first and this was restricted to the HR- subset [TOT: 11.7 vs. 7.4 mo., hazard ratio = 0.478 (95% CI: 0.333–0.685), P < 0.0001; OS: 19.7 vs. 11.8 mo., hazard ratio = 0.478 (95% CI: 0.303–0.756)]. Analysis of this large real-world dataset allowed interrogation of T-DXd and SG benefit and treatment sequencing across HER2-negative subsets, providing important clinical insights into two widely used ADCs in breast cancer. We demonstrate improved relative outcomes associated with T-DXd in HR+ tumors across all HER2-negative subgroups and comparable benefit of the two ADCs in TNBC. Sequencing preference was seen in HR−/HER2-null patients only, favoring SG-first for TOT and OS. These findings warrant further validation in independent cohorts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Breast Cancer Research
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-025-02094-7
Citations
2
Primary Topic
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of trastuzumab deruxtecan and sacituzumab govitecan in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a large real-world data analysis

Reshma Mahtani, Jennifer R. Ribeiro, Milan M. Radovich, Jeffrey P. Solzak et al.
2 citations
Breast Cancer Research
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
2.09
article

Comparison of trastuzumab deruxtecan and sacituzumab govitecan in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a large real-world data analysis

Reshma Mahtani, Jennifer R. Ribeiro, Milan M. Radovich, Jeffrey P. Solzak, Matthew James Oberley, George W. Sledge, Joanne Xiu, David B. Spetzler, Maryam B. Lustberg
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) are antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) increasingly used in HER2-negative breast cancer. We hypothesized that treatment benefit would vary across HER2-null, HER2-ultra-low, and HER2-low subgroups of HER2-negative breast cancer patients. We also aimed to study the clinical impact of different sequencing of the two ADCs. We analyzed a large, real-world cohort of 4,030 HER2-negative breast cancer specimens from patients treated with T-DXd or SG. Tumors underwent molecular profiling including HER2 status (IHC, CISH) and hormone receptor (HR) status (IHC) at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ, USA). Real-world clinical data were obtained from insurance claims and analyzed by Cox proportional hazards. HER2-low, HER2-ultra-low, and HER2-null cohorts treated with T-DXd had decreasing time-on-treatment (TOT; 4.8, 4.1, and 3.5 mo., respectively, P < 0.001), while HER2 status had little impact on SG TOT (3.0, 2.8, and 3.4 mo., respectively). Patients with HR+/HER2-negative tumors showed longer TOT when treated with T-DXd only (n = 1,049) than with SG-only (n = 453), even in the HER2-null subset (P < 0.001). In all HER2-negative patients treated with both ADCs, T-DXd-first (n = 547) or SG-first (n = 432) showed no cumulative TOT difference (10.4 vs. 10.8 mo., P = 0.356); however, the HER2-null subset showed preference for SG-first and this was restricted to the HR- subset [TOT: 11.7 vs. 7.4 mo., hazard ratio = 0.478 (95% CI: 0.333–0.685), P < 0.0001; OS: 19.7 vs. 11.8 mo., hazard ratio = 0.478 (95% CI: 0.303–0.756)]. Analysis of this large real-world dataset allowed interrogation of T-DXd and SG benefit and treatment sequencing across HER2-negative subsets, providing important clinical insights into two widely used ADCs in breast cancer. We demonstrate improved relative outcomes associated with T-DXd in HR+ tumors across all HER2-negative subgroups and comparable benefit of the two ADCs in TNBC. Sequencing preference was seen in HR−/HER2-null patients only, favoring SG-first for TOT and OS. These findings warrant further validation in independent cohorts.

Breast Cancer ResearchVol. 27(1)
Baptist Hospital of Miami (US), Yale University (US), Caris Life Sciences (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
2.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.