Tuning Magnetism of Metal–Organic Framework by Different Types of Pressure

The properties of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are expected to be sensitive to external pressures because of their inherently flexible structures. Although pressure-driven structural transitions have been intensively studied, the influence of pressure on magnetism has been less exploited for MOFs. Especially, the efficiency of applied pressure may strongly depend on the pressure-transmitting medium (PTM), which may have a complex interaction with MOFs. Here, the distinctive effects of different types of pressure are reported, including isotropic hydrostatic pressure, quasi-hydrostatic pressure, and uniaxial pressure, on the anisotropic magnetism of the perovskite MOF, [CH<sub>3</sub>NH<sub>3</sub>][Co(HCOO)<sub>3</sub>]. It is found that the hydrostatic pressure has the minimal effect, whereas the uniaxial pressure has the highest efficiency in tuning magnetization and magnetic anisotropy of the MOF. First-principles calculations reveal that the applied low pressures do not significantly alter the superexchange pathways, while local distortions of the CoO<sub>6</sub> octahedra emerge as the dominant factor governing magnetic modulation. Moreover, the weakening of hydrogen bonds under uniaxial pressure is proposed to be the primary mechanism responsible for the suppression of single-ion magnetism. These findings underscore the potential applications of directional pressure in precisely controlling the magnetic and electronic properties of MOFs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202505333
Primary Topic
Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tuning Magnetism of Metal–Organic Framework by Different Types of Pressure

Huixia Fu, Young Sun, Na Su, Shuang Liu et al.
Small
Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
article

Tuning Magnetism of Metal–Organic Framework by Different Types of Pressure

Huixia Fu, Young Sun, Na Su, Shuang Liu, Yan Liu
article en

Abstract

The properties of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are expected to be sensitive to external pressures because of their inherently flexible structures. Although pressure-driven structural transitions have been intensively studied, the influence of pressure on magnetism has been less exploited for MOFs. Especially, the efficiency of applied pressure may strongly depend on the pressure-transmitting medium (PTM), which may have a complex interaction with MOFs. Here, the distinctive effects of different types of pressure are reported, including isotropic hydrostatic pressure, quasi-hydrostatic pressure, and uniaxial pressure, on the anisotropic magnetism of the perovskite MOF, [CH<sub>3</sub>NH<sub>3</sub>][Co(HCOO)<sub>3</sub>]. It is found that the hydrostatic pressure has the minimal effect, whereas the uniaxial pressure has the highest efficiency in tuning magnetization and magnetic anisotropy of the MOF. First-principles calculations reveal that the applied low pressures do not significantly alter the superexchange pathways, while local distortions of the CoO<sub>6</sub> octahedra emerge as the dominant factor governing magnetic modulation. Moreover, the weakening of hydrogen bonds under uniaxial pressure is proposed to be the primary mechanism responsible for the suppression of single-ion magnetism. These findings underscore the potential applications of directional pressure in precisely controlling the magnetic and electronic properties of MOFs.

SmallVol. 21(37)
Chongqing University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.