nmax and the quest to restore caution, integrity, and practicality to the sample size planning process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Methods
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000776
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

nmax and the quest to restore caution, integrity, and practicality to the sample size planning process.

Yi Feng, Gregory R. Hancock
1 citations
Psychological Methods
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
1.40
article

nmax and the quest to restore caution, integrity, and practicality to the sample size planning process.

Yi Feng, Gregory R. Hancock
article en
1 citations

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Psychological Methods
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

nmax and the quest to restore caution, integrity, and practicality to the sample size planning process. — Yi Feng, Gregory R. Hancock · Psychological Methods (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS