Non‐breeding social behaviour as an investment in reducing future territoriality costs

Territoriality is costly, and animals should adopt strategies to cope with these costs. Seasonal territoriality for breeding - a common strategy in many groups of animals - can reduce costs during the non-breeding season but requires establishing new territories every breeding season. Many seasonal breeders also become more tolerant of conspecifics during the non-breeding season and form social groups containing many individuals. Recent evidence has suggested that these social associations are not random and can entail carry-over effects extending into the following breeding season. Here, we propose that one strategy that seasonal, territorial breeders may employ is to use non-breeding social behaviour to reduce future breeding territoriality costs, through a dear-enemy-like effect. Specifically, by being social during the non-breeding season with previous territorial neighbours, individuals can increase both their and their neighbour's survival, and jointly defend and exploit common territorial areas, ultimately reducing neighbourhood turnover. Reduced neighbourhood turnover can then facilitate re-forming prior territorial boundaries, thereby offsetting the costs of territory establishment and facilitating earlier breeding (which can significantly increase reproductive output). We review evidence supporting our hypothesis and provide predictions and future research directions to bridge current gaps in understanding the link between non-breeding social behaviours and breeding territoriality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70066
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non‐breeding social behaviour as an investment in reducing future territoriality costs

Damien R. Farine, Ettore Camerlenghi, Samuele Ramellini, Brendah Nyaguthii
1 citations
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
4.20
article

Non‐breeding social behaviour as an investment in reducing future territoriality costs

Damien R. Farine, Ettore Camerlenghi, Samuele Ramellini, Brendah Nyaguthii
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Territoriality is costly, and animals should adopt strategies to cope with these costs. Seasonal territoriality for breeding - a common strategy in many groups of animals - can reduce costs during the non-breeding season but requires establishing new territories every breeding season. Many seasonal breeders also become more tolerant of conspecifics during the non-breeding season and form social groups containing many individuals. Recent evidence has suggested that these social associations are not random and can entail carry-over effects extending into the following breeding season. Here, we propose that one strategy that seasonal, territorial breeders may employ is to use non-breeding social behaviour to reduce future breeding territoriality costs, through a dear-enemy-like effect. Specifically, by being social during the non-breeding season with previous territorial neighbours, individuals can increase both their and their neighbour's survival, and jointly defend and exploit common territorial areas, ultimately reducing neighbourhood turnover. Reduced neighbourhood turnover can then facilitate re-forming prior territorial boundaries, thereby offsetting the costs of territory establishment and facilitating earlier breeding (which can significantly increase reproductive output). We review evidence supporting our hypothesis and provide predictions and future research directions to bridge current gaps in understanding the link between non-breeding social behaviours and breeding territoriality.

Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical SocietyVol. 100(6)
Australian National University (AU), ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH), University of Zurich (CH), Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior (DE), Collegium Helveticum (CH)
National Science Foundation, Australian Government, European Commission, Australian National University, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.