Evaluation of road performance and carbon emission accounting analysis of recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste

This study deals with the problem of consumption of construction waste and shortage of traditional construction materials, offering a technical and environmental basis for the recycling and utilization of construction and demolition waste (CDW). Using waste concrete and waste bricks as recycled aggregates for pavement base materials, and cement, lime and fly ash as stabilizers, this study systematically explores the feasibility of stabilizing recycled aggregate-based materials for road use. The basic physical properties and macro-mechanical properties are analyzed, and the effects of stabilizer dosage (ESR), recycled aggregate dosage (RASR), and brick-concrete ratio (BCR) on the roadability of stabilized recycled aggregate materials are investigated. Revealing the significance and critical effects of multi-factors of strength development. Life cycle assessment (LCA) method is employed to measure the carbon emissions of different materials used as road pavement sub-base and compare them with those of natural aggregates. The results show that stabilized construction waste recycled aggregate is suitable for road subgrade. ESR, RASR and BCR have a significant effect on it with the order of BCR > RASR > ESR. The optimum ratio exists at 30% ~ 45% recycled aggregate blending and 1:2 of BCR. The carbon emission of cement stabilized class can be reduced from 60,789.66 to 48,117.03 kgCO<sub>2eq</sub> by using recycled construction waste aggregate instead of natural aggregate during construction period based on the base unit (a flow section length of 500 m as the basic unit), which is 19.2% reduction in carbon emission. For the lime fly ash stabilized category, the carbon emission is reduced from 53,246.65 to 41,734.03 kgCO<sub>2eq</sub>, which is 21.6% reduction in carbon emission. Recycled aggregates alone can achieve carbon emission reductions of 82.27%, 81.23%, and 78.02%, demonstrating a substantial environmental benefit in carbon reduction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13354-z
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of road performance and carbon emission accounting analysis of recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste

Wei Zeng, Ning Li, Yimin Wang, Yanqing Du et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
2.01
article

Evaluation of road performance and carbon emission accounting analysis of recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste

Wei Zeng, Ning Li, Yimin Wang, Yanqing Du, Xiaoxu Duan, David C. Yang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study deals with the problem of consumption of construction waste and shortage of traditional construction materials, offering a technical and environmental basis for the recycling and utilization of construction and demolition waste (CDW). Using waste concrete and waste bricks as recycled aggregates for pavement base materials, and cement, lime and fly ash as stabilizers, this study systematically explores the feasibility of stabilizing recycled aggregate-based materials for road use. The basic physical properties and macro-mechanical properties are analyzed, and the effects of stabilizer dosage (ESR), recycled aggregate dosage (RASR), and brick-concrete ratio (BCR) on the roadability of stabilized recycled aggregate materials are investigated. Revealing the significance and critical effects of multi-factors of strength development. Life cycle assessment (LCA) method is employed to measure the carbon emissions of different materials used as road pavement sub-base and compare them with those of natural aggregates. The results show that stabilized construction waste recycled aggregate is suitable for road subgrade. ESR, RASR and BCR have a significant effect on it with the order of BCR > RASR > ESR. The optimum ratio exists at 30% ~ 45% recycled aggregate blending and 1:2 of BCR. The carbon emission of cement stabilized class can be reduced from 60,789.66 to 48,117.03 kgCO<sub>2eq</sub> by using recycled construction waste aggregate instead of natural aggregate during construction period based on the base unit (a flow section length of 500 m as the basic unit), which is 19.2% reduction in carbon emission. For the lime fly ash stabilized category, the carbon emission is reduced from 53,246.65 to 41,734.03 kgCO<sub>2eq</sub>, which is 21.6% reduction in carbon emission. Recycled aggregates alone can achieve carbon emission reductions of 82.27%, 81.23%, and 78.02%, demonstrating a substantial environmental benefit in carbon reduction.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Tianjin Foreign Studies University (CN), Tianjin Municipal Engineering Design and Research Institute (CN), South China University of Technology (CN)
Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.