RMTD-03 SOCIOECONOMIC DISPARITIES IN CLINICAL TRIAL ENROLLMENT AMONG PATIENTS WITH BRAIN METASTASES: A CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS IN NEIGHBORHOOD-DISADVANTAGE METRICS

Abstract Socioeconomic disparities significantly influence health outcomes in patients with brain metastases (BM), yet their influence on clinical trial enrolment remain understudied. This cross-sectional analysis evaluated 1,802 patients (non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC]: n=1,536; melanoma: n=182; HER2-positive breast cancer: n=84) treated at Penn State Cancer Institute (2006–2022) to assess associations between neighborhood disadvantage metrics, education, and clinical trial enrollment. Neighborhood disadvantage was measured via the Area Deprivation Index (ADI; national/state percentiles/deciles) and Community Human Development Index (CHDI). Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses examined predictors of enrollment and survival outcomes. An improved overall survival was noted in clinical trial enrollees versus non-enrollees across all patients (p=0.0043), without a significant association between ADI and survival. Subgroup analyses (NSCLC, melanoma, HER2+ breast cancer) showed no survival benefit linked to trial participation, likely related to the limited sample size in each cohort. Higher education (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00–1.03; p=0.02) significantly predicted increased trial enrollment in the combined cohort. Conversely, elevated national ADI (NADI; OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96–0.99; p=0.007) and state ADI (SADI; OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74–0.97; p=0.02) were associated with reduced enrollment, suggesting that residing in disadvantaged neighborhoods decreased access. Trends toward increased enrollment with higher life expectancy (p=0.072) and CHDI (p=0.068) were also observed. In melanoma patients, lower income was independently associated with enrollment (p=0.04). These findings underscore socioeconomic inequities in trial access, driven by education and neighborhood disadvantage, and highlight survival advantages for enrollees. Targeted interventions addressing structural barriers in disadvantaged communities are critical to improving equity in cancer care and research participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology Advances
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaf123.109
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RMTD-03 SOCIOECONOMIC DISPARITIES IN CLINICAL TRIAL ENROLLMENT AMONG PATIENTS WITH BRAIN METASTASES: A CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS IN NEIGHBORHOOD-DISADVANTAGE METRICS

Ahmad Ozair, Nicholas Mikolajewicz, Manmeet S. Ahluwalia, Alireza Mansouri et al.
1 links
Neuro-Oncology Advances
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

RMTD-03 SOCIOECONOMIC DISPARITIES IN CLINICAL TRIAL ENROLLMENT AMONG PATIENTS WITH BRAIN METASTASES: A CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS IN NEIGHBORHOOD-DISADVANTAGE METRICS

Ahmad Ozair, Nicholas Mikolajewicz, Manmeet S. Ahluwalia, Alireza Mansouri, Leonardo de Macêdo Filho, M.A.I. Salem, Jack Ibinson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Socioeconomic disparities significantly influence health outcomes in patients with brain metastases (BM), yet their influence on clinical trial enrolment remain understudied. This cross-sectional analysis evaluated 1,802 patients (non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC]: n=1,536; melanoma: n=182; HER2-positive breast cancer: n=84) treated at Penn State Cancer Institute (2006–2022) to assess associations between neighborhood disadvantage metrics, education, and clinical trial enrollment. Neighborhood disadvantage was measured via the Area Deprivation Index (ADI; national/state percentiles/deciles) and Community Human Development Index (CHDI). Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses examined predictors of enrollment and survival outcomes. An improved overall survival was noted in clinical trial enrollees versus non-enrollees across all patients (p=0.0043), without a significant association between ADI and survival. Subgroup analyses (NSCLC, melanoma, HER2+ breast cancer) showed no survival benefit linked to trial participation, likely related to the limited sample size in each cohort. Higher education (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00–1.03; p=0.02) significantly predicted increased trial enrollment in the combined cohort. Conversely, elevated national ADI (NADI; OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96–0.99; p=0.007) and state ADI (SADI; OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74–0.97; p=0.02) were associated with reduced enrollment, suggesting that residing in disadvantaged neighborhoods decreased access. Trends toward increased enrollment with higher life expectancy (p=0.072) and CHDI (p=0.068) were also observed. In melanoma patients, lower income was independently associated with enrollment (p=0.04). These findings underscore socioeconomic inequities in trial access, driven by education and neighborhood disadvantage, and highlight survival advantages for enrollees. Targeted interventions addressing structural barriers in disadvantaged communities are critical to improving equity in cancer care and research participation.

Neuro-Oncology AdvancesVol. 7(Supplement_2)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Baptist Hospital of Miami (US), University of Toronto (CA), Florida International University (US), Baptist Health South Florida (US), Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.