MMAP-17 MANAGEMENT OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES WITH IPILIMUMAB AND NIVOLUMAB WITH OR WITHOUT UPFRONT COMPREHENSIVE STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY

Abstract BACKGROUND The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi/nivo) has been shown to have intracranial efficacy in well-selected patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM). Questions remain regarding the indications for upfront versus deferred comprehensive stereotactic radiosurgery (cSRS) in this context. METHODS This single-institution retrospective study identified patients who started ipi/nivo for newly diagnosed MBM between 2018 and 2023 with or without upfront cSRS. Exclusionary criteria included prior whole brain radiotherapy, >15 MBM, or leptomeningeal disease. Clinical outcomes were compared using multivariable regression models and reported with adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) [95% confidence intervals]. The first instance of intracranial progression was further categorized by the presence of local failure (enlargement of MBM) and/or distant failure (new MBM). RESULTS Of the 132 patients identified, 52.3% received upfront cSRS and 47.7% did not. Patients treated with upfront cSRS were more commonly characterized by larger brain metastases (median 2.3 cm vs. 0.7 cm; p<0.001), symptomatic brain metastases (59.4% vs. 11.1%; p<0.001), the absence of a BRAF V600 mutation (65.2% vs. 46.0%; p=0.035), and the use of upfront craniotomy (47.8% vs. 7.9%; p<0.001). Median overall survival was 47.0 months for all patients, without significant improvement noted from upfront cSRS (aHR 1.01 [0.60-1.68]; p=0.98). However, upfront cSRS was associated with longer intracranial progression-free survival (median 16.8 vs. 5.5 mo; aHR 0.47 [0.30-0.74]; p=0.001). Local intracranial failure occurred less commonly for those treated with upfront cSRS (1.4% vs. 44.4%), though distant intracranial failure rates were similar (47.8% vs. 42.9%). Symptomatic radionecrosis from upfront SRS occurred in 18.1% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Patients with MBM started on ipi/nivo have good overall prognosis, but those managed with upfront cSRS tended to have higher risk features. Preservation of equivalent survival in this population highlights the effectiveness of cSRS in mitigating adverse features, in addition to reducing intracranial progression.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology Advances
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaf123.056
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MMAP-17 MANAGEMENT OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES WITH IPILIMUMAB AND NIVOLUMAB WITH OR WITHOUT UPFRONT COMPREHENSIVE STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY

Subasree Srinivasan, Isabella Glitza Oliva, Ian E. McCutcheon, T. Kleber et al.
Neuro-Oncology Advances
Brain Metastases and Treatment
article

MMAP-17 MANAGEMENT OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES WITH IPILIMUMAB AND NIVOLUMAB WITH OR WITHOUT UPFRONT COMPREHENSIVE STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY

Subasree Srinivasan, Isabella Glitza Oliva, Ian E. McCutcheon, T. Kleber, Bikash Panthi, Michael A. Davies, Jeffrey S. Weinberg, Sherise Desiree Ferguson, Hussein Tawbi, Sujit S. Prabhu, Martin C. Tom, Caroline Chung, Thomas Hendrix Beckham, Subha Perni, Jing Li, Chenyang Wang, Diana Kaya, Robert A. Floyd, Todd A. Swanson, Denái R. Milton
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi/nivo) has been shown to have intracranial efficacy in well-selected patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM). Questions remain regarding the indications for upfront versus deferred comprehensive stereotactic radiosurgery (cSRS) in this context. METHODS This single-institution retrospective study identified patients who started ipi/nivo for newly diagnosed MBM between 2018 and 2023 with or without upfront cSRS. Exclusionary criteria included prior whole brain radiotherapy, >15 MBM, or leptomeningeal disease. Clinical outcomes were compared using multivariable regression models and reported with adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) [95% confidence intervals]. The first instance of intracranial progression was further categorized by the presence of local failure (enlargement of MBM) and/or distant failure (new MBM). RESULTS Of the 132 patients identified, 52.3% received upfront cSRS and 47.7% did not. Patients treated with upfront cSRS were more commonly characterized by larger brain metastases (median 2.3 cm vs. 0.7 cm; p<0.001), symptomatic brain metastases (59.4% vs. 11.1%; p<0.001), the absence of a BRAF V600 mutation (65.2% vs. 46.0%; p=0.035), and the use of upfront craniotomy (47.8% vs. 7.9%; p<0.001). Median overall survival was 47.0 months for all patients, without significant improvement noted from upfront cSRS (aHR 1.01 [0.60-1.68]; p=0.98). However, upfront cSRS was associated with longer intracranial progression-free survival (median 16.8 vs. 5.5 mo; aHR 0.47 [0.30-0.74]; p=0.001). Local intracranial failure occurred less commonly for those treated with upfront cSRS (1.4% vs. 44.4%), though distant intracranial failure rates were similar (47.8% vs. 42.9%). Symptomatic radionecrosis from upfront SRS occurred in 18.1% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Patients with MBM started on ipi/nivo have good overall prognosis, but those managed with upfront cSRS tended to have higher risk features. Preservation of equivalent survival in this population highlights the effectiveness of cSRS in mitigating adverse features, in addition to reducing intracranial progression.

Neuro-Oncology AdvancesVol. 7(Supplement_2)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.