RDTA-13 OUTCOMES AFTER SRS AND IPILIMUMAB/NIVOLUMAB FOR PATIENTS WITH MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES WITH OR WITHOUT PRIOR CHECKPOINT EXPOSURE

Abstract While ipilimumab/nivolumab has demonstrated promising intracranial activity among patients with melanoma brain metastases (BM), patients with prior immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) exposure may be at higher risk of worse intracranial disease control. We evaluated outcomes of patients with melanoma BM treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without prior ICI. Overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) were estimated from SRS using a non-parametric method, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to test clinically relevant factors. 64 consecutive patients with 393 treated BM between 2015 and 2024 were included with median follow-up of 20.2 months from SRS. 34 (53%) patients were alive at analysis. The 2-year OS and iPFS for the entire cohort was 52.1% and 36.4%, respectively. 32 patients (50%) had prior exposure to ICI. Performance status, age, number of BM, and receipt of surgery were not significantly different among patients with or without prior ICI. Patients with prior ICI had smaller BM (largest median diameter 19 mm vs 22.5 mm, p=0.022) and were less likely to have extracranial metastases (53.1% vs 78.1%, p=0.035). Patients with prior ICI exposure trended towards worse iPFS (median iPFS 4.3 months vs 13.5 months, p = 0.29) and had worse survival after SRS (median OS 17.6 months vs 50.5 months, p = 0.017). On univariate analysis, receipt of prior ICI (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.13 – 4.11, p = 0.019), no upfront surgery (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20 – 0.72, p = 0.003), and number of treated BM (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1 – 1.08, p = 0.043) were significantly associated with OS. While ipilimumab/nivolumab with SRS demonstrates encouraging intracranial control, patients with prior ICI exposure are at higher risk of poor outcomes and may benefit from additional treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology Advances
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaf123.100
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RDTA-13 OUTCOMES AFTER SRS AND IPILIMUMAB/NIVOLUMAB FOR PATIENTS WITH MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES WITH OR WITHOUT PRIOR CHECKPOINT EXPOSURE

Emily S. Lebow, Ravi K. Amaravadi, John N. Lukens, Tara C. Mitchell et al.
Neuro-Oncology Advances
Brain Metastases and Treatment
article

RDTA-13 OUTCOMES AFTER SRS AND IPILIMUMAB/NIVOLUMAB FOR PATIENTS WITH MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES WITH OR WITHOUT PRIOR CHECKPOINT EXPOSURE

Emily S. Lebow, Ravi K. Amaravadi, John N. Lukens, Tara C. Mitchell, Lynn M. Schuchter, Ahron Flowers, Michelle Alonso‐Basanta, Robert A. Lustig, Ian Messing, Lauren Linkowski, Harper Hubbeling, Christina Jackson, Suyash Mohan, S. Nagda, Alexander C. Huang, John Y. K. Lee, Xingmei Wang, Jay F. Dorsey, Goldie Kurtz, Matthew D Riina
article en

Abstract

Abstract While ipilimumab/nivolumab has demonstrated promising intracranial activity among patients with melanoma brain metastases (BM), patients with prior immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) exposure may be at higher risk of worse intracranial disease control. We evaluated outcomes of patients with melanoma BM treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without prior ICI. Overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) were estimated from SRS using a non-parametric method, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to test clinically relevant factors. 64 consecutive patients with 393 treated BM between 2015 and 2024 were included with median follow-up of 20.2 months from SRS. 34 (53%) patients were alive at analysis. The 2-year OS and iPFS for the entire cohort was 52.1% and 36.4%, respectively. 32 patients (50%) had prior exposure to ICI. Performance status, age, number of BM, and receipt of surgery were not significantly different among patients with or without prior ICI. Patients with prior ICI had smaller BM (largest median diameter 19 mm vs 22.5 mm, p=0.022) and were less likely to have extracranial metastases (53.1% vs 78.1%, p=0.035). Patients with prior ICI exposure trended towards worse iPFS (median iPFS 4.3 months vs 13.5 months, p = 0.29) and had worse survival after SRS (median OS 17.6 months vs 50.5 months, p = 0.017). On univariate analysis, receipt of prior ICI (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.13 – 4.11, p = 0.019), no upfront surgery (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20 – 0.72, p = 0.003), and number of treated BM (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1 – 1.08, p = 0.043) were significantly associated with OS. While ipilimumab/nivolumab with SRS demonstrates encouraging intracranial control, patients with prior ICI exposure are at higher risk of poor outcomes and may benefit from additional treatment strategies.

Neuro-Oncology AdvancesVol. 7(Supplement_2)
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.