MMAP-02 EVALUATION OF THE BRAIN METASTASIS CLINIC PATIENT EXPERIENCE IN A MULTIDISCIPLINARY SETTING

Abstract Most institutions utilize Press Ganey surveys to evaluate patient experiences in single-provider settings, but these surveys do not capture experiences in multidisciplinary care models. Given the advancements in precision medicine, innovative surgical techniques, and multiple radiation modalities, oncology care for brain metastases increasingly relies on coordinated care from medical oncology, radiation oncology, neurosurgery, neuroradiology, advanced practice providers (APPs), nursing, and research staff. In the Brain Metastasis Clinic (BMC), patients receive comprehensive, coordinated care, including clinical assessments, review of medical records and imaging, symptom management, clinical trial identification, and individualized treatment planning. A unique feature is that patients are seen in a single visit by a neurosurgeon, CNS radiation oncologist, and medical oncologist, with prior case review by a neuroradiologist. This reduces the need for multiple appointments and alleviates patient burden. From the initial patient referral to disposition of treatment, the BMC APPs play a key role in high-touch clinical navigation, personalized communication, and coordination with patients and providers. The BMC also offers clinical trial options for patients who are traditionally excluded. However, traditional patient satisfaction surveys, such as Press Ganey, do not capture the patient experience in this collaborative care model. This gap limits our understanding of how multidisciplinary approaches affect patient satisfaction, emotional well-being, retention, and clinical outcomes. Project Goals: 1.) Evaluate Patient Satisfaction: Assess satisfaction specific to the multidisciplinary care experience, focusing on the effectiveness of APP-driven navigation, coordination, and communication. 2.) Measure Emotional and Psychological Impact: Understand how the multidisciplinary approach affects emotional distress, anxiety, and empowerment during treatment. 3.) Examine Downstream Revenue: Assess the financial outcomes of the BMC, considering how coordinated care and efficient treatment contribute to sustained patient care and revenue. 4.) Evaluate Patient Retention: Determine whether multidisciplinary care influences patient willingness to continue treatment and recommend the clinic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology Advances
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaf123.043
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MMAP-02 EVALUATION OF THE BRAIN METASTASIS CLINIC PATIENT EXPERIENCE IN A MULTIDISCIPLINARY SETTING

Gisela Sanchez‐Williams, Audrey Hartnett, Catherine Sharif
Neuro-Oncology Advances
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

MMAP-02 EVALUATION OF THE BRAIN METASTASIS CLINIC PATIENT EXPERIENCE IN A MULTIDISCIPLINARY SETTING

Gisela Sanchez‐Williams, Audrey Hartnett, Catherine Sharif
article en

Abstract

Abstract Most institutions utilize Press Ganey surveys to evaluate patient experiences in single-provider settings, but these surveys do not capture experiences in multidisciplinary care models. Given the advancements in precision medicine, innovative surgical techniques, and multiple radiation modalities, oncology care for brain metastases increasingly relies on coordinated care from medical oncology, radiation oncology, neurosurgery, neuroradiology, advanced practice providers (APPs), nursing, and research staff. In the Brain Metastasis Clinic (BMC), patients receive comprehensive, coordinated care, including clinical assessments, review of medical records and imaging, symptom management, clinical trial identification, and individualized treatment planning. A unique feature is that patients are seen in a single visit by a neurosurgeon, CNS radiation oncologist, and medical oncologist, with prior case review by a neuroradiologist. This reduces the need for multiple appointments and alleviates patient burden. From the initial patient referral to disposition of treatment, the BMC APPs play a key role in high-touch clinical navigation, personalized communication, and coordination with patients and providers. The BMC also offers clinical trial options for patients who are traditionally excluded. However, traditional patient satisfaction surveys, such as Press Ganey, do not capture the patient experience in this collaborative care model. This gap limits our understanding of how multidisciplinary approaches affect patient satisfaction, emotional well-being, retention, and clinical outcomes. Project Goals: 1.) Evaluate Patient Satisfaction: Assess satisfaction specific to the multidisciplinary care experience, focusing on the effectiveness of APP-driven navigation, coordination, and communication. 2.) Measure Emotional and Psychological Impact: Understand how the multidisciplinary approach affects emotional distress, anxiety, and empowerment during treatment. 3.) Examine Downstream Revenue: Assess the financial outcomes of the BMC, considering how coordinated care and efficient treatment contribute to sustained patient care and revenue. 4.) Evaluate Patient Retention: Determine whether multidisciplinary care influences patient willingness to continue treatment and recommend the clinic.

Neuro-Oncology AdvancesVol. 7(Supplement_2)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.