RDTA-20 BRAIN-DIRECTED RADIOTHERAPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES TREATED WITH TUMOR-INFILTRATING LYMPHOCYTE (TIL) THERAPY

Abstract PURPOSE Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy is an emerging option for treatment-refractory melanoma. Studies for TIL therapy approval excluded patients with uncontrolled melanoma brain metastases (MBMs). Given the timeline from TIL harvest to infusion and use of lymphodepletion there are concerns about intralesional hemorrhage, intracranial progression and toxicity. There are limited data on management of MBMs during the peri-TIL therapy window and the safety/efficacy of integrating radiotherapy (RT). METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced melanoma that underwent TIL harvest at a single institution from May to December 2024 with attention to clinical outcomes, RT parameters and adverse events (CTCAEv5.0) related to TIL therapy or RT. Patients with MBMs were stratified by receipt of RT and timing of development of MBMs relative to TIL harvest. RESULTS 9 patients with MBMs and undergoing TIL harvest were identified. Median time from TIL harvest to infusion was 2.1mo and median follow-up post-harvest was 4.4mo. Two patients had known MBMs and underwent RT >3mo prior to TIL harvest. 55% (5 of 9) of patients developed new MBMs during the window from TIL harvest to infusion. 67% (6 of 9 patients) underwent brain-directed RT. Of note, 50% of patients that underwent RT had evidence of possible intralesional bleed noted on brain MRI prior to RT. RT-related toxicity was minimal with grade 1-2 fatigue, grade 1 headaches and no radiographic or symptomatic radiation necrosis. There were no intracranial bleeding events after TIL harvest. Extracranial, regional brain and irradiated/local control was 44%, 67%, 83%, respectively. CONCLUSION Our experience suggests that treatment of MBMs with RT in patients undergoing TIL therapy is feasible and safe. Given the risk of intracranial progression or development of new MBMs between TIL harvest and infusion, RT is an option as a consolidative ‘bridging’ therapy for intracranial disease control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology Advances
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaf123.107
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RDTA-20 BRAIN-DIRECTED RADIOTHERAPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES TREATED WITH TUMOR-INFILTRATING LYMPHOCYTE (TIL) THERAPY

Melin J. Khandekar, Ryan J. Sullivan, Priscilla Kaliopi Brastianos, Ariel E. Marciscano et al.
Neuro-Oncology Advances
Brain Metastases and Treatment
article

RDTA-20 BRAIN-DIRECTED RADIOTHERAPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES TREATED WITH TUMOR-INFILTRATING LYMPHOCYTE (TIL) THERAPY

Melin J. Khandekar, Ryan J. Sullivan, Priscilla Kaliopi Brastianos, Ariel E. Marciscano, Alexandra M. Haugh, Sonia Cohen, Helen Alice Shih, Donald P. Lawrence, Matthew J. Frigault, Abrar Choudhury, Meghan J. Mooradian, Kevin Oh
article en

Abstract

Abstract PURPOSE Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy is an emerging option for treatment-refractory melanoma. Studies for TIL therapy approval excluded patients with uncontrolled melanoma brain metastases (MBMs). Given the timeline from TIL harvest to infusion and use of lymphodepletion there are concerns about intralesional hemorrhage, intracranial progression and toxicity. There are limited data on management of MBMs during the peri-TIL therapy window and the safety/efficacy of integrating radiotherapy (RT). METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced melanoma that underwent TIL harvest at a single institution from May to December 2024 with attention to clinical outcomes, RT parameters and adverse events (CTCAEv5.0) related to TIL therapy or RT. Patients with MBMs were stratified by receipt of RT and timing of development of MBMs relative to TIL harvest. RESULTS 9 patients with MBMs and undergoing TIL harvest were identified. Median time from TIL harvest to infusion was 2.1mo and median follow-up post-harvest was 4.4mo. Two patients had known MBMs and underwent RT >3mo prior to TIL harvest. 55% (5 of 9) of patients developed new MBMs during the window from TIL harvest to infusion. 67% (6 of 9 patients) underwent brain-directed RT. Of note, 50% of patients that underwent RT had evidence of possible intralesional bleed noted on brain MRI prior to RT. RT-related toxicity was minimal with grade 1-2 fatigue, grade 1 headaches and no radiographic or symptomatic radiation necrosis. There were no intracranial bleeding events after TIL harvest. Extracranial, regional brain and irradiated/local control was 44%, 67%, 83%, respectively. CONCLUSION Our experience suggests that treatment of MBMs with RT in patients undergoing TIL therapy is feasible and safe. Given the risk of intracranial progression or development of new MBMs between TIL harvest and infusion, RT is an option as a consolidative ‘bridging’ therapy for intracranial disease control.

Neuro-Oncology AdvancesVol. 7(Supplement_2)
Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Radiation Oncology Associates (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.