Selections of environmental substrates for DNA-based monitoring of multiple trophic biodiversity in a whole lake ecosystem

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has become a powerful tool for effective biomonitoring and bioassessment in aquatic ecosystems. However, the effectiveness of eDNA from various substrates (e.g., water, plankton nets, and sediment) in monitoring lake biodiversity across multiple trophic levels remains underexplored. This study assessed the performance of these substrates in terms of: (1) detection precision, (2) biodiversity coverage at taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional levels and (3) sensitivity in ecological health assessment of a lake ecosystem. Samples were collected from 11 sites in Dianchi Lake, China, and analyzed using multiple genetic loci (16S-V3, 18S-V9, COI, and mitochondrial 12S rDNA) to detect a broad range of taxa, including bacteria, cyanobacteria, eukaryotic phytoplankton, fungi, protozoa, zooplankton, macroinvertebrates, and fish. Totally, 8693 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were identified from 36 phyla, 765 genera, and 421 species. Firstly, water samples showed the highest detection precision (93.89 % ± 5.33 %), defined as the repeatability of sequence detection across biological replicates, followed by sediment and plankton nets for zooplankton. Secondly, a single substrate captured only 42.48 % of taxonomic and 39.72 % of phylogenetic diversity, but over 88 % of functional diversity. Furthermore, substrates explained 58.83 %±8.25 % of community composition variations, with water and plankton net samples more sensitive to spatial changes, particularly in response to land use. Overall, water samples were optimal for monitoring small organisms (e.g., cyanobacteria, eukaryotic phytoplankton, fungi and protozoa), while plankton nets excelled for zooplankton. Both water and sediment samples effectively captured fish biodiversity, but all substrates showed limited capacity for assessing macroinvertebrates. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing eDNA-based monitoring methods and supporting better environmental management decisions. • 8693 ASVs were identified across 8 trophic groups, representing 36 phyla, 765 genera, and 421 species. • eDNA monitoring achieved >80 % precision, with water samples exhibiting higher reproducibility than sediment. • Single substrates captured >88 % of functional diversity but missed significant taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity. • Land use, especially cropland and urbanization, significantly influenced community composition, with substrate-specific responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Conservation
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03800
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selections of environmental substrates for DNA-based monitoring of multiple trophic biodiversity in a whole lake ecosystem

Jianghua Yang, Yuanyuan Lin, Zheng Zhao, Shan Xu et al.
Global Ecology and Conservation
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Selections of environmental substrates for DNA-based monitoring of multiple trophic biodiversity in a whole lake ecosystem

Jianghua Yang, Yuanyuan Lin, Zheng Zhao, Shan Xu, Xiaowei Zhang, Lijuan Zhang
article en

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has become a powerful tool for effective biomonitoring and bioassessment in aquatic ecosystems. However, the effectiveness of eDNA from various substrates (e.g., water, plankton nets, and sediment) in monitoring lake biodiversity across multiple trophic levels remains underexplored. This study assessed the performance of these substrates in terms of: (1) detection precision, (2) biodiversity coverage at taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional levels and (3) sensitivity in ecological health assessment of a lake ecosystem. Samples were collected from 11 sites in Dianchi Lake, China, and analyzed using multiple genetic loci (16S-V3, 18S-V9, COI, and mitochondrial 12S rDNA) to detect a broad range of taxa, including bacteria, cyanobacteria, eukaryotic phytoplankton, fungi, protozoa, zooplankton, macroinvertebrates, and fish. Totally, 8693 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were identified from 36 phyla, 765 genera, and 421 species. Firstly, water samples showed the highest detection precision (93.89 % ± 5.33 %), defined as the repeatability of sequence detection across biological replicates, followed by sediment and plankton nets for zooplankton. Secondly, a single substrate captured only 42.48 % of taxonomic and 39.72 % of phylogenetic diversity, but over 88 % of functional diversity. Furthermore, substrates explained 58.83 %±8.25 % of community composition variations, with water and plankton net samples more sensitive to spatial changes, particularly in response to land use. Overall, water samples were optimal for monitoring small organisms (e.g., cyanobacteria, eukaryotic phytoplankton, fungi and protozoa), while plankton nets excelled for zooplankton. Both water and sediment samples effectively captured fish biodiversity, but all substrates showed limited capacity for assessing macroinvertebrates. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing eDNA-based monitoring methods and supporting better environmental management decisions. • 8693 ASVs were identified across 8 trophic groups, representing 36 phyla, 765 genera, and 421 species. • eDNA monitoring achieved >80 % precision, with water samples exhibiting higher reproducibility than sediment. • Single substrates captured >88 % of functional diversity but missed significant taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity. • Land use, especially cropland and urbanization, significantly influenced community composition, with substrate-specific responses.

Global Ecology and ConservationVol. 62
Kunming University (CN), Nanjing Normal University (CN), Yunnan University (CN), State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse (CN), Yunnan Institute of Environmental Sciences (CN), Yunnan Environmental Protection Bureau (CN), Nanjing University (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.