Evaluating Attitudes Toward Microchip Implants: A Comparative Study of five Eastern European Countries

Abstract Background and purpose Technology acceptance has been researched for decades. While some technologies are widely accepted, others are perceived as a threat, such as microchip implants. In this study, a two-step structural equation modeling approach was used to evaluate a new research model on microchip implant acceptance. Methodology A structural equation modeling model was developed to identify what influences the perceived acceptance of microchip implants. To determine differences in attitudes toward microchip implants, the study was conducted in five Eastern European countries. Results The results show that the influence of the factors does not differ significantly across the countries studied. Age, trust, and perceived usefulness affected the overall intention to use microchip implants, while ease of use was significant in only one country. Differences were found in perceptions of the right to privacy and conspiracy theories. The usefulness of microchip implants in pandemic was significant in all countries. Conclusion Small differences in attitudes towards microchip implants suggest that a general model of microchip implant acceptance could be constructed based on the data collected. In addition to these findings, our study noted the lack of legislation for microchip implants in the region and a lack of knowledge about this technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organizacija
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2025-0014
Primary Topic
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Attitudes Toward Microchip Implants: A Comparative Study of five Eastern European Countries

Anja Žnidaršič, Daria Maltseva, Łukasz Zakonnik, Vanja Bevanda et al.
1 links
Organizacija
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
article

Evaluating Attitudes Toward Microchip Implants: A Comparative Study of five Eastern European Countries

Anja Žnidaršič, Daria Maltseva, Łukasz Zakonnik, Vanja Bevanda, Аленка Баггиа, Borut Werber, Stanislav Moissev, Maryna Vovk
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and purpose Technology acceptance has been researched for decades. While some technologies are widely accepted, others are perceived as a threat, such as microchip implants. In this study, a two-step structural equation modeling approach was used to evaluate a new research model on microchip implant acceptance. Methodology A structural equation modeling model was developed to identify what influences the perceived acceptance of microchip implants. To determine differences in attitudes toward microchip implants, the study was conducted in five Eastern European countries. Results The results show that the influence of the factors does not differ significantly across the countries studied. Age, trust, and perceived usefulness affected the overall intention to use microchip implants, while ease of use was significant in only one country. Differences were found in perceptions of the right to privacy and conspiracy theories. The usefulness of microchip implants in pandemic was significant in all countries. Conclusion Small differences in attitudes towards microchip implants suggest that a general model of microchip implant acceptance could be constructed based on the data collected. In addition to these findings, our study noted the lack of legislation for microchip implants in the region and a lack of knowledge about this technology.

OrganizacijaVol. 58(3)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), University of Economics in Katowice (PL), Juraj Dobrila University of Pula (HR), University of Maribor (SI), National Technical University "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute" (UA)
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Univerza v Mariboru
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.